You forced the Worgen to pull back from Lordaeron, before they retreat back - INTO Gilneas. Why would they retreat back into a city they had just surrendered to Sylvanas? It’s not her’s.
This is crap justification, I hope you know this. But I’m talking about invading Gilneas specifically. There was nothing to warrant it on Gilneas’s end, it was all a one-sided attack.
That means nothing to what you initially said. You attempted to discredit that the attack was not provoked by saying that Gilneas was her territory. Right by conquest only comes into effect AFTER the conquest.
1 Like
unwarranted implies its without order, which is wrong, Garrosh told her to invade Gilneas. a city that is currently covered in blight? you think they went there? that’s not a smart thing to say when arguing about gilneas. it wasn’t unprovoked, silverpine forest is hers too, Gilneas was exposed, and they took the opportunity. also being neutral means nothing, they still fought with the horde, they are hostiles all the way.
I don’t know how any of that discredited what I just said, but you’re either a troll or you have some very poor headcanons.
2 Likes
Which, the Scarlet Brotherhood would like to point out, has nothing to do with her Undead condition. AND the Brotherhood has recruited 3 additional wrestlers to participate in events. You see, the Brotherhood is all about love!
#ScarletTolerance #selflove #undeadnotunfeeling #capedcrusaders #wrassling
well 1 you think they retreated into a city covered with something that can kill them.
2. its not unprovoked, the gilneans have always been enemies of the horde, trying to use their neutrality as a means to ignore that fact is just bad arguing.
3. its not unwarranted, it was ordered, if you are going to use a word, learn what it means first.
4. the gilnean resistance were forced to surrender, the entire rebellion was about reclaiming the land. sylvanas beat them, its 100% hers by right of conquest.
Does that responsibility involve losing a city?
you cant usurp a fallen kingdom. that’s just silly.
The Alliance are not the only ones in the eastern kingdoms, so this is a useless statement.
Something something Scarlet Crusade rightful government of Lordaeron.
4 Likes
shes the ruler, you don’t seem to know what usurp means. to take by force, she didn’t take it by force, it was abandoned. you keep trying to find contradictions that aren’t there.
She literally killed all the Lordaeronian forces there after killing Balnazzar. That ain’t abandoned. Furthermore, her claim on Lordaeron - illegitimate for such a claim, as she took it for herself as opposed to inheriting it - does NOT warrant the entirety of the Eastern Kingdoms, as Lordaeron is not the be-all-end-all for the continent. Terenas Menethil didn’t own the entirety of the EK, did he?
2 Likes
um no? that’s wrong, she killed Garithos and his men after freeing them from the dreadlords mind control, and then he helped reclaim undercity under the guise that he would become its leader. And after that, he still insults Sylvanas and orders her to leave Lordaeron, despite the fact it was her who reclaimed it. just further proof what your alliance bias is like, literally defending the alliance genocider. Garithos 100% deserved to die.
… that’s… that’s literally what I just said in extended form. Yes, Garithos was a crappy dude, and yes, he deserved to die. But in the context, neither Garithos or Sylvanas knew each other beforehand, and Sylvanas plotted his death (and all of his men) BEFORE he told her to get out of the city. I am not defending Garithos, but his unpleasantness is meta-knowledge that Sylvanas did not have. Doesn’t matter how unpleasant the commander was, Sylvanas planned to usurp them and then did so without any knowledge of that.
Perhaps check that you’re not spewing the same thing in worse terms, you boob.
2 Likes
Numerous Lordaeron soldiers remained in the area, some of them joining a specific organization known for combating the undead. An organization that is the only reason that Tirisfal has any human civilian population at all.
1 Like
No he did not.
Here are the kingdoms.
Lordaeron looks pretty weird though.
https://cdn.blizzardwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Chronicle_2_seven_kingdoms.jpg
2 Likes
Case and point, just as Terenas did not have any sort of claim to the entire continent with his hereditary rule in Lordaeron, Sylvanas definitely doesn’t have any sort of claim with her usurped one.
1 Like
you said she killed the lordaeronians there, she only killed Garithos. who she was fully aware was an unpleasant dude, the first thing he said to sylvanas was call her an elf witch.
Is she not an elf witch?
And no, the lore states that Garithos’s entire platoon - all Lordaeronians - was wiped out by the Forsaken. Not just him.
1 Like
funny how your case in point are stuff only you believe were said.