… did you have a stroke or something, what the hell do you mean?
I don’t believe it was said, I know it as fact because she posted it with lore evidence. You have done no such thing.
… did you have a stroke or something, what the hell do you mean?
I don’t believe it was said, I know it as fact because she posted it with lore evidence. You have done no such thing.
I never claimed teranas had owned all the kingdoms, only you said that. you are beyond stupid if you think you can put your words into my mouth.
You said
Terenas was the ruler of Lordaeron before her, yet he had no right to all of the Eastern Kingdoms. You’re failing to see the simple connection.
Owning Lordaeron means you own just that and nothing else. It is one of Seven Kingdoms. Not the apex of the continent’s hierarchy.
wrong, it never states anything of the sort. theres also the small tidbit that a lot of his forces were DWARVES, not lordaeronians! you are now lying.
I never stated he did have right to all of the eastern kingdoms, you still believe im talking about hereditary rights when ive stated multiple times that its her right by conquest and her right as the largest military force in the northern eastern kingdoms. you are just too dense to take seriously.
there I changed it because you cant seem to comprehend that their are more than just hereditary rights when you control a kingdom.
Lordaeron was pretty huge, and Garithos, while having alot of soldiers under his command, didnt have all of them. There were still some ex-Silverhand around as well.
Someone should change the title of this thread, you guys are Aggressors.
Given how she states that the HUMANS are a means to an end and not simply Garithos, do the math. You think the living humans just rolled over and let Sylvanas take their city after killing their commander? Naw, they dead.
I’m not saying you did, I am giving an example in the form of the last person to hold that position. Try to keep up, laddie boy.
A right to conquest would require an actual conquest first. She conquested Lordaeron, and the surrounding areas of Silverpine and Hillsbrad, so yes, she has a right to them by conquest. However, you claimed that she has a right to ALL of the Eastern Kingdoms since she was the ruler of Lordaeron. You said nothing about right to conquest.
If you did, you’d also be wrong, as she has NOT conquested all of the Eastern Kingdoms.
No, bucko, you changed it because you got called out and now need to furiously backpeddle. /golfclap
so lets address this step by step, because you clearly need it.
you have proven that you are a liar, a condescending jerk, and a conceited fool.
Okay, lemme just… I gotta lean back in my chair in exasperation for a second… boy, you are just somethin’ else, aren’t ya?
Don’t say dumb things, such as
I’m insinuating nothing about what you’re saying, I’m contesting your claim that Sylvanas has a right to Eastern Kingdoms - by conquest or otherwise - by saying that Terenas, the previous ruler, had no such right given to him by throne or force. Therein, neither does Sylvanas. You sir, are the one putting words in my mouth now to fit your petulant victim narrative.
Like a third at best. I’d hardly call that most. Don’t really see why that’s relevant anyway, as she’s yet to claim it OR kill said paladins, especially in the face of losing Lordaeron.
I’m inclined not to believe you, as you’re rather all over the place in what suits you. Hell, even right now you’re changing this post.
Cry me a river.
literally only added stuff, took nothing away, besides you hadn’t posted anything I can edit it all I want. you are now making stupid reasons to insult me instead of doing what you say you were, and that’s contesting my claim that sylvanas has a right to the eastern kingdoms, which she does, your contesting of that claim has proven fruitless.
refusal to recognize that is your own failure, along with lying and making stuff up.
More victimization! Woe is you!
Sylvanas has no more right to the Eastern Kingdoms than other monarchs like Anduin, Danath, or Lor’themar do, yet it has absolutely nothing to do with her position as ruler of Lordaeron like you said it did. If you’re gonna double down on being wrong, be consistent at least.
love how you think im the victim, when you are literally throwing a tantrum about being called out for making stuff up. you are such a child.
Buddy, I’ve just been throwing your own crap back at you. You’re the one going off the rails about how I’m “too stupid” or “dense.” Keep on crying me that river, boyo.
sylvanas has the right of conquest and the right of military strength. you are a delusional little man to constantly ignore that basic fact.
Oh. You’re from Tichondrius. That explains a lot about you.
And yes, Sylvanas HAD the numbers. That only means she could do something resembling a conquest. That does not mean she has any form of right to anything past what she already owns (and even that can be called into question).
see? you cant even continue with an actual argument, you can only be a child. you lie, you lash out, you are literally a child.
How am I supposed to “actually argue” with “you are such a child.” That’s not an argument. That’s you flinging crap again.
wyrmrest accord…so you’re literally a child. you could try continuing your argument onsylvanas, but its clear that you aren’t going to since you were wrong about so much, and are now too defensive to actually engage in it. you are literally a child
Homeboy, you’re on the Story Forums. Me coming from an RP realm makes the most sense.
And now, I present to you a montage:
And yet I’M the one throwing the tantrum, right? At the very least, come up with something more creative than “you are literally a child.” If you’re gonna have a fit, be entertaining.