GDKP in a nutshell

That is a really good question because you are right, there is no Trade (services) in SoD. There are two paths Blizzard can take with that:

  • They could state that if there is no Services channel, then they mean they don’t want the advertising for carries/gold exchange runs.
  • They could state that in the absence of the Services channel the closest is regular Trade. Do not use LFG. That one I know is against the rules.

I don’t think they have issued a statement on it, but I could have missed it if they did.

My personal thoughts don’t matter, but I would advise using Trade, if anything, and being very very limited in the amount a person posts it. Every 5 mins is likely to annoy the realm and get reported.

As someone who has not been banned, like yourself, I do feel like I’m in more of an authority on wow policy than you :slightly_smiling_face:

Well until Blizzard clarifies the new rules and makes a Services channel, I advise to continue using LFG as is logical :expressionless:

I could legit just copy paste the same thing to them every time lol. The argument goes nowhere.

1 Like

Except for the third time with you, I wasn’t ‘sanctioned’ due to being ‘spammy’ or in the wrong place (wasn’t spammy, still unclear if the wrong place), they outright said it was because of the inappropriate language and otherwise would have been ignored. I’m not appealing this again. They don’t review it or give you any new information. They just agree with themselves.

When you get banned, don’t come crying.

There’s also a services channel, it’s called /trade

2 Likes

I’m not banned, I’m suspended, again, I wasn’t talking about you. I was talking about the green text.

with the constant spam of GDKP in LFG, I don’t think anyone is worried about it :expressionless:

Thankfully there is low spam on my server. We are doing all we can to make things as hostile as possible for gold buyers and people who engage in RMT.

I aim to get as many gold buyers banned as possible.

3 Likes

That’s a lot of tangos fellas!

Yeah I’m not on the greasy servers so I enjoy relative peace and enjoyment

They also have people( the vast majority) who don’t fall into either of those two hard categories. In fact unless a buyer is literally AFKing at the entrance they are also participating in the raid.

And since the raids are the same as any other raid the GDKP’s with high value items are also you know the hardest raids and the ones where everyone has to actually you know do their part.

2 Likes

Appreciate you clarifying. If it’s something that can be raised with Blizz so that the policy is consistent across all versions, it’d be a good step in the right direction to get to the bottom of all the uproar.

1 Like

They pay to get carried dude, you guys are gonna kill this pig with all that lipstick.

1 Like

You think any heroic LK GDKP is bring a bunch of fresh 80 buyers?

yup, the GDKPs I’ve been in never had designated buyers and carries. we all just played and got loot using an auction-based system. all this anti-GDKP stuff comes from a place of envy and misunderstanding :expressionless:

2 Likes

You were sanctioned - whatever the bloody reason. You can pick and choose which of the reasons that were given. You being abusive to other players and/or the spam and inappropriate advertising.

I was trying to just leave off with a kind word and wishing you luck and you still need to argue in with this mess.

You’ve been given the correct information. Don’t want to believe it? Try your luck and we’ll be seeing you again in CS when you want to complain about being sanctioned again.

1 Like

No they don’t? You have min log req for a heroic icc, the best selling items are trinkets and things end gamers want. These aren’t fresh dead weight.

In sod, you can clear bfd with 10x people in lv 15 greens. No one is a carry.

1 Like

Whether or not I was sanctioned wasn’t up for debate. That was obvious. Bringing that up repeatedly doesn’t justify the suspension, it just acknowledges it. You’re stuck living in a just world hypothesis.

At best intentional misunderstanding but more often willful maliciousness.

2 Likes