Where? Because if they did it was quickly updated with
They said they specifically DID NOT want to provide balance changes
If so, most players should be angry at Blizzard for not buffing them hard enough. As Ret still aren’t dominant lol.
Nah you’re bitterness about the meta of a different game (vanilla and TBC) isn’t a factor for most players I’d wager (that’s a you issue) - many of which didn’t even play Vanilla or TBC.
It’s not the job of the devs to wipe your salty tears.
If you look at WCL the majority of players with WOTLK parses don’t have parses recorded on that character for both Vanilla and TBC. This suggests to me that a lot of current WOTLKC raiding player base either:
- Didn’t play TBC and Vanilla Classic
- Played different classes in Vanilla and TBC
Or some mix of the two.
Therefore, your entire proposition that Blizzard should shape the WoTLKC meta to ensure “other specs get a go” is a non sequitur. The last two iterations of Classic are irrelevant to this one. Your whole position is just your own saltiness and should be ignored.
Id be ok with ret getting a big buff. Blizzard said they werent going to so im assuming thats not whats going to happen. But if they did Id welcome it for them since like I said they never get any time on top.
Agreed
one of the lead devs in an interview at the start of wotlk
Kris Zierhut
then what is the cr ap with arbitrarily buffing rets 10% and ferals 20%? two very high utility specs?
your point is illogical in the face of the facts
if sims and evidence showed warriors scaling way better than anyone it would make sense to hold off and not give them the feral treatment, but Aggrend said at 252 warriors would be kings but instead theyre still at the bottom. We have sims to compare to as well and the scaling thing is a myth. Warriors scale in parallel to others. Assassination got more out of Ulduar than Fury did lmao. If warriors scaled like this from 213 to 240, there is no miracle from 240 to 260 that will change much. And the sims confirm it. Even worse, sims show feral scales super well and theyll only get more broken with time…
1 Like
Well they explained it actually
Ret was because they had no other DPS alternatives so they wanted to bump them to stay competitive while also having them remain on the bottom.
Feral was to combat a degenerative playstyle. If you have an issue with this then Id argue its all the more reason to touch nothing else.
You’re welcome
Also before you go off on the whole " tHe fLoOdgAtz R oPeN" stance
They’re aware of you. They don’t care. Munching fix is all warriors should get
2 Likes
You forgot to drop the mic.
I don’t disagree - it’s you’re reasoning that stinks.
Even a broken clock can be correct twice a day…
Never buff warriors.
I was going to say - I reckon Drinknblink would even oppose fixing munching for Warriors - only fix ignite lol.
You’re sort of the poster child for salt. Which I still find hysterical given you play a class that was OP in every facet of the game during Vanilla and was arguably as obnoxious as the Warrior player base at the time. I mean - a mage player salty about Warriors in Vanilla! ROFL - you can’t make this stuff up!
Fury Warriors don’t have a competitive DPS alternative either.
Fury Warriors have a “degenerative” playstyle too.
I’m not saying they should but what makes you so certain that Blizzard won’t apply the same logic to Warriors?
And don’t say “because they said so” - they said a lot of things they’ve since gone back on.
I’m not salty.
Munching should be fixed for all classes.
I just love the fact you’re all so upset about warrior DPS, buffing them would ruin that.
I’m not really. Apart from fixing munching and maybe looking at sunder stacking I’m pretty cool with where Fury is at.
What style is that? Are they out there flowerweaving/clamweaving/bearweaving/chugging troll blood elixirs?
Because they told you?
You don’t think having to weave a macro into your rotation and weapon swing times which has the sole purpose of desyncing weapon swings is a bit degenerate?
The parses people show of Warriors doing okay all do this. And all the other Fury’s are bottom of the barrel - below Ret.
Not at all. Thats just playing the spec at an optimal level as it was intended
The players who play the spec correctly play it better?
The players who don’t use a specific macro in a specific way aren’t playing the class correctly? And the requirement to use that player created macro is not degenerate? Okay - whatever you say champ.
yes
/thread
Here you go brown boys - according to the salty Slicy Blizzard are officially balancing Warriors around this:
/cleartarget
/targetlasttarget
/startattack
And this:
https://wago.io/search/swing+timer
But Bearweaving is utterly degenerate ROFL!
So using macros and WAs to optimize gameplay is degenerate
How am i gonna break it to all the other specs in the game…
Using bearform is too then (by your logic) … nothing degenerate there - just players playing well.