I would equate it to someone talking on their phone while in a movie screening. You would not hear the person you ignored, but you will hear everyone responding to them. Ignore the troll and youâll see every person who took the bait.
I would like to have a blue confirm this before I change my stance. In general though, when I see the masses of vitriol on these forums, it feels to me like a bad idea for such a system to give any players such a power, unless serious penalties (like account closure) were a thing in the case of system abuse. And in advance since I know that will probably draw fire.
Yes, it absolutely has to be draconian to discourage abuses like that. A 24 hour ban is nothing if it robbed a innocent player of their time for not kissing X playerâs hand.
Correct and unlike just ignoring it the squelch might first off have prevented them from doing it in the first place and second serve as notification not to do it again.
So why do you keep bringing up the whole âI saw itâ, when you have to see it, in order to report it
And an âIgnoreâ means theyâre not going to be doing it, to me, anymore. I donât utilize my Ignore list lightly. You have to do something pretty foul, in order to get on there. Talking about Politics in Trade Chat doesnât bother me. I can leave the Chat, at any time
I donât have to interact with those people who didnât even notice I was there, in the first place
See point a, a possible negative consequence makes it more likely someone wonât be trolling chat in the first place. And now see point b, just because I donât see someoneâs chat directly doesnât mean it wonât impact me in some way.
Again Iâll ask for a Blue confirmation of this actually being the case before I change my mind on such a system. If you have a citation or source, I would love to read it.
Confirmation of âwhatâ being the case? The fact that the system has been in place for years in the game you are currently playing, or that people abusing the system are punished? The latter is patently true and you need no blue to tell you this, and the latter has been cited earlier in this thread.
Sorry, youâre not making any sense. If you want to report somebody for them to be âSilencedâ they have to perform the crime. If they donât perform the crime, how can you âteachâ them, if they didnât commit the crime?
And, Iâm sorry, thereâs no proactive solution here. Itâs always been reactive.
Itâs a much easier system to abuse than you think.
You said it yourself, theyâre not hiring a bunch of GMâsâŚ
So how are they going to keep up with all the claims of false reports?
Iâd rather play a game with unmoderated chat than a game where players can legally DDOS each other.
Yes getting DCâd as a result of a player imposed âsquelchâ thatâs identical to a âsilenceâ is part of the rights management on the server side of the system.
Itâs not something blizzard will have a cute work around to fix it either or they would have done so in one of their modern games where itâs still abused and disruptive.
Thatâs how I took it. And I think being able to leave a Channel is a great thing. Iâm not being forced to stay in there to take in the words whether itâs âabuseâ or not is irrelevant. I can leave the Channel, at any time.
I donât know how you can equate me asking for a link with Trolling. Rather your starting to sound like the people who rush to judgment and attack anyone with divergent opinions. Standard operation for would be internet tyrants. âYou disagree with me! You DARE?! Iâll show you!â
These are also the very people that concern me having such power over other players, and by proxy why I believe that such draconian measures for false reports are not only merited, but absolutely necessary.
Thank you for proving my point on how report happy posters are.