Oh wow you sure got me.
Thanks for proving you got nothing part of my stance. Bonus kudos for you.
2 Likes
See thatâs where weâre different. Youâre here trolling and winning to you means you got me with a clever troll. Youâre playing the dozens. Iâm not trying to come up with a good troll. I just donât care about you.
Says the person intentionally trying to slander anyone who disagrees with his agenda. Lol.
And how do you figure that, changes of the dual spec scope are on the table based on what weâve seen.
Convenient hourly reminder to Ziryus 
No one cares what the devs said 15 years ago. Not the current classic devs, not even you. Youâll use them if you can find one that says something that agrees with you and ignore or disagree with them when they donât
Multi-boxing is not a violation of our policies.
That is all.â
Malkatorix, Blizzard Poster
The ability to make your characters cast their individual spells and skills at once by pressing 1 button is automation.
Is not automation by our standards. This is why multi-boxing is just fine.
Youâre arguing a 3rd party program vs core game design intententions.
It doesnât work.
Both me and Blizzard care.
I was against multiboxing. Itâs the original devs that told us it was fine. I donât care what the devs said 15 years ago about multiboxing and I donât care what the devs said about dual spec. All I care about is what the current devs say now. Youâre the one who tells us what the devs said about multiboxing was all a lie and they would have banned if they had the technology. If the devs were constantly lying about multiboxing how can you trust what they say about dual spec? Maybe theyâre lying there too.
Feel free to also send me a Delorean to when that was relevant.
1 Like
You clearly donât or you would have defended multiboxing and fought against the changes. And if the current blizzard devs cared they would never have banned input broadcasting software and hardware. If blizzard cared about the intentions of the original devs they wouldnât have changed the arena points from a start point of 1500 to zero.
It was relevant during the era that this expansion is attempting to replicate at least fairly authentically.
Right so itâs not relevant now.
Go find me a quote from blizzard regarding dual spec in TBC Classic or a time machine.
Thatâs not what I am saying at all. You are again intentionally misrepresenting what I am saying.
I am saying that 3rd party software is not part of game design. Thus the devs of today changing their ruling on it is not the same, or even remotely comparable to them changinging their mind on intentional game design.
They allowed the use of it back then, but they did not design it or try to make it part of the game, they put 0 hours into developing multiboxing as they didnât make it. They did however make tbc without dual spec, and did so intentionally.
Multi boxing is not comparable to dual spec.
Iâm pretty sure a logical interpretation of what I just said implies very clearly that it is relevant now.
Iâm happy with most kind of time machine, doesnât have to be a delorean, even a forward only one.
1 Like
Nothing is comparable to anything else for you. The old devs were very clear about dual spec and even more clear and more detailed about multiboxing. You treat what they said about dual spec as the word of god and call them liars about their many posts about multiboxing. Youâre just a hypocrite and a bs-er.
I donât really know what youâre talking about but Iâll just assume itâs more pathetic bumbling over the fact you wonât get dual spec.
Someone who doesnât get a futurama ref is a killjoy, shockerâŚ
LudditeâŚ
1 Like
In my and othersâ case itâs more like Iâm trying to maintain the joy.
Iâm so sorry that on this aspect, TBC Classic is just like original TBC, I feel for you.