continue to develop alongside the community
You may want to research the definitions of these words individually before responding again. You are making yourself look worse and worse (which is fine by me, I’m really enjoying it!).
If our roles were reversed, I’d disappear into another thread 
You can keep doing you but I’m actually really enjoying watching you squirm here Please continue, I can keep pointing out your lack of a grasp on the English language.
yeah and they could be using thier gold on something they like insted of respec so … yeah it would help then to stop buying gold
You’re acting smug like you’ve brought some kind of winning information to the table lol, we all know about these comments, but they are decidedly vague and can be interpreted in wildly different ways which has also been debated to hell and back in early versions of this topic.
Also, they have more recent comments that illustrate that they are hesitant to change things even when they admit to the thing in question being silly or not intuitive, due to the fact that it’s authentic the way it is.
Blizzard explicitly said they don’t want to fix battle squawking, for example, despite the fact they agree the mechanic is silly and obnoxious, because it’s “authentic” to how it was, and that’s in a thread on the CC forum where the OP complaining about it has tons of upvotes.
It’s clearly not the popular position, but because it’s authentic, they don’t want to change it.
That’s proof enough of where Blizzard likely stands on other issues. Its patently clear that this means when they were talking about changes and evolving with the community, they didn’t mean literally anything, they mean only in ways that remain authentic to TBC and/or avoid compromising an important era-specific design philosophy too much.
Blizzard has literally and quite recently spoken about upcoming possible changes to battle chicken. Your confirmation bias is absolutely shocking. If they were intent on nochanges, they wouldn’t have even addressed it. Why would you bring up a point that literally counters your own argument?
Have they stated what they consider their limit on changes? No - they haven’t. Therefore any changes are on the table. Every single time they suggest a change, or make a change, or say that a change is on the table, your argument about a faithful recreation sinks deeper into its grave. Right now that grave has almost reached Earths mantle.
Less than a month ago, friend.
Are you implying that their protocol for changes has morphed since then?
Allchanges, just like I said.
No one has ever received any confirmation that every change is on the table.
They truly are #allchanges, glad we finally got a true admission.
I never said I’m #allchanges, I’m saying that “continue to develop alongside the community” strictly means #couldbemorechanges
I remember why I stopped responding to you, you need to be led to water when there’s a lake in front of you.
At least we’re getting new dumb arguments - dual specs will stop people from buying gold, lol. Id love to peer into their crystal ball but everytime I try its like staring into the bottom of a gas station toilet.
Its not my fault that basic english is beyond your grasp. Any change means every proposed change or all changes.
People who cant argue straight or dont understand what theyre typing should leave off with the insults because accusing people what youre guilty of just makes you look even dumber than you already do.
I agree this is not a good argument, as I don’t care about the gold cost.
If you don’t mean #allchanges then please don’t use the term #allchanges, because I have never said #allchanges was my view. I think you’re beginning to mix up the audience of this thread.
You could just say you misspoke and meant something else and apologized for the error.
When someone says “any” change is on the table that means every change is on the table aka all proposed changes or allchanges.
I don’t state my opinions as facts, you may hate wotlk but it doesnt mean it sucked when those 12 million subs proves how wrong you are for even stating that it sucked.
It’s not the pinnacle of gaming, just WoW so deal with it
That’s funny cause while 2008 had a few MMORPGs released during that time (Age of Conan, WAR, Everquest 2 and Aion) basically all of them failed. Hell WAR is one of my favorite MMORPGs but it still couldn’t match the titan that Wotlk became. Even if you go by older MMORPGs pre 2008 like Everquest and FF11, they still couldn’t hold a dogs fart against Wotlk.
Cool story, some people did the same with classic vanilla and no one cares.
Cool story kid
Nah your opinion is still garbage /shrug deal with it
I don’t think you know what bad taste means kid, I mean you think Wotlk sucks so that proves you have no idea what good taste is so you should probably learn what it means to have good taste before preaching to someone.
Its all in the eye of the beholder but if I had my way it would go Vanilla - great; TBC - near perfect; Wrath - meh its okay.
I’m really susceptible to gaslighting, can’t you tell?
You’re still wrong. You are living in a box, inside of another box. The rest of us are in the outer box, where all the existing changes are. Your box has windows, to see inside the larger box but you want to stay in the smaller box. That’s on you.
I’m just going to point your own words back at you.
Real intellectual mastermind debater here
How can you people type this so unironically and like, not even blink? How little self awareness can you have in a debate?
You quite literally said there is no known limit to the changes and by virtue of this ANY change was therefore and hereto, on the table. Thats allchanges whether you are cognizant of it or not.
Forget the double standard, your real problem is the double think. Get your thoughts together and get back to me. Or dont, I really dont care, nor do I have any reason to.
Does ANY = ALL to you?
Let me give you an example. I could go to the market any day next week. This does not mean I will go to the market all days next week.
I hope this helps you in life.
The cherry picking is cute but when put in the context of the clear implication of “no known limit” prior to the word ‘any’ it takes on an entirely different connotation. Like I said, basic english.
Gimme the second language excuse and save some face here.
Any of your teachers could have failed you in your education, that must mean that all of your teachers failed you in your education.