yeah Drift dox yourself to win an internet argument
1 Like
Or Blizzard saw that such a feature like seals had such a large impact on faction imbalance with the influx of BE Paladin vs the reduction in Alliance Paladin that they decided to step in and prevent queues from being worse than they already are? You can go back and fix a mistake, that isn’t a problem. What you are acting like is not having Dual Spec was a mistake Blizzard needs to rectify, and it wasn’t. The seals? Totally.
4 Likes
I’m sure they’re not programming guild banks from scratch. Quantitative terms are relative. what is a long wait for you might seem like a short wait for me. What seems like little work for me might seem like and ardorous task for you.
You are pulling so hard at nothing it’s hilarious to watch you scramble to defend this argument
ok.
All I care about is that this thread has over 11 hundred posts and there are other dual spec topics with several hundred. I don’t care at all about what any you morons post. They just give me a reason to reply and get the thread longer. The more strum and drang the more likely the issues comes to blizzard’s attention. Thank you for your help in this endevour
Complete overhauls to the game system which changes identity of class and spec does not equate to “QoL” changes anymore than the massive increase in threat, reduction of mana consumption and increase of mana recovery qualify as “QoL”.
1 Like
Yeah, there’s no way I could have said it better myself.
A change that simply makes it easier and cheaper to do something you can already do unlimited times for gold doesn’t overhaul anything
2 Likes
Again, they wanted to release TBC as TBC but in combination and awareness of the modern gaming community. It’s just your wish that they are trying to keep it as original as possible, but they already changed a lot of things to make it better, so your wish doesn’t match with reality.
There is basically no reason to not ask for something very helpful like dual spec!
Why don’t you discuss then? Or why don’t you have a problem with that, as it is basically different from og tbc already. Haven’t seen a single tear about that yet. Why so? I mean, they already changed your beloved og tbc, they are sooooo mean! You guys want all those bugs, lag spikes, no battle.net anymore and so on, right? 
You claim the same for dual spec. These changes still made it into the game, so why not add more when a lot of people ask for and basically only a very very very very minority might get harmed from it.
You are right, there is no reason to not add it!!!
You’re right; there is absolutely no reason not to ask. There are, however, several good reasons for Blizzard to answer: “No.”
2 Likes
No that very much is an overhaul to the system. You are allowing someone to completely negate any kind of negative consequence of choice with no penalty. You remove identity of class and what is brought to the table. Blizzard began changing design of encounters at this point to better suit the “You can do what you want between two specs” era. This was the first step made to homogenizing classes for the sake of “Bring the player, not the class.” That is a massive overhaul to change your design choices.
1 Like
Old blue post on a thread asking for Tri-Spec. Additional spec slots were considered a QoL change.
Dual Spec is a QoL change.
Haven’t seen a single solid reason so far, but a million great reasons to say “Yes, let’s do it! Great change!”
1 Like
And Ghostcrawler claimed the overhaul of the threat and mana system were all “QoL” changes for the tanking and healing classes. Which many would argue was an overhaul of the system.
3 Likes
It should pretty obviously have an impact on the gold supply.
You forgot “In my opinion as none of these are facts.” You want it, so of course you’ll cheer on anyone that says something as mundane as “Dual spec FTW! Give me a HELL YEAH!” While dismissing those who do not agree with you because you want it, and could care less for the reasoning of those who do not want it.
And to be fair it’s the same on either side. Not just the pro DS crowd.
1 Like
Lmfao all that proves is how unaware blizzard was at the time of the changes they were about to make to their game, and the far reaching implications of those changes.
Which may have been an issue in Vanilla or BC when gold was largely scarce. But the economy is very different now so I don’t see how that applies in Classic.
If they want a gold sink, they should add a fee for every time you start a boss fight!
Something like everyone in the raid have to pay 5 gold. I am sure it would help the game to generate more content, raid groups, etc. right? Because that’s actually what missing dual spec is causing: less played content!
Anyways: We already mentioned a few example of how the gold sink could still be there, but with less impact. A flat rate for respeccing for 30 days for like 250g for example. Or dual spec for 2500g. And so on.