This analogy is nonsense.
The choice is in which build you actively select to play at any given moment.
With dual spec, you can pick one of two options.
With tri spec, you can pick one of three options.
That’s more choice, objectively.
2 Likes
It depends The reason why dual speck is OK and I’m not ok with Tri speck is because then that there’s no choice left.
Having to choose between 2 builds is good you have an amazingspect and an offs back The reason I’m not OK with 3 specs is because it takes away from that.
If anything this is the one time that I’ll agree very literally with your philosophy yes limitations are necessary This dull speck is good I’m OK with some of that barrier being gone I think 3 specs though is way too much.
Because then you literally can be anything I’m OK with people having access to an offspec this gives healers and tanks and PV p’s access to a second Spec.
Trispect just feels excessive I mean There’s still value in The Choice of the offspec it’s cool to say I’m a healer tank It feels a little more
Boring if you can literally say oh well I’m a All three If that makes sense at all Like I said I’m OK with dual spec one because it was implemented during wrath.
So it didn’t happen that far after tbc Trispect all that happened wod I’m pretty sure it was wod.
That’s a lot more And I’m not against bringing retail features in if they make sense it would be good for the game.
Dual spec would be perfect I think trice Beck would just be too much that’s my take on it I find it hilarious you’re arguing about me with this.
As much as I want dual spec but when I go against Tri spec all the sun you think that’s a stupid argument which I find humorous.
I mean All the arguments you have against duel speck And I think trispec would be too much and yet you wanna argue my logic with that I find that funny.
Right and if you had actually read what I wrote I specifically noted that people want dual spec for those on the side kind of activities.
Adding a barrier to them makes it less likely people will do them and instead simply will log out.
Dual spec doesn’t really fit here, farming gold and doing respecs is not hard, it’s merely a time sink.
Except that choice doesn’t actively matter in content for the most part, it’s a barrier to entry not a way you actually do content.
Someone could have 100 specs and they’d still sit in the same spec all the time for whatever content they’re doing because wait for it, that’s the best spec for what they’re doing and having other specs doesn’t change that. I realize this confuses you.
No…it does not depend.
You’re just wrong and your logic is incoherent.
Your entire thought process is incoherent.
Most of your posts are wholly incoherent.
1 Like
Would also help with the tank/healer shortage some servers experience.
1 Like
Hey look another 1 post history alt.
I wonder how many railing against dual spec are only going to run a single spec in Wrath when dual spec becomes available - will it all of a sudden become acceptable? The arguments against it are just foolish.
Correct. It’s made up. If Blizzard implemented Dual Spec in TBC Classic, they would buy it and keep on playing. Because…
Are Garrison’s acceptable for TBC because they appeared in WoD?
Talk about foolish arguments.
3 Likes
Who is asking for Garrisons?
At least you acknowledge your comment is asinine. Appreciate the honesty. “D” level argument. I bet you’re rock hard thinking that was clever. Now answer the question, will you use dual spec in Wrath?
No, because I have no intentions of playing Wrath. Doesn’t make your stance or line of questioning any less absurd though. We dont even have confirmation Wrath Classic is going to be a thing. Even if we did that doesnt help you. We are not talking about Wrath.
Not the point, Just an expose on the logic being used. Dual specs are okay for TBC because they were in Wrath - that logic says that any feature (LFD, LFR etc) anyone likes from any expansion is now a fit for TBC because it was in retail at one point or another.
1 Like
Just because a path of logic evades you doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist.
Regale us with why dual spec is a detriment in TBC that is not present in Wrath? I’ll save you the time - you can’t. There are many valid reasons it would be helpful and the only argument against it is “no changes” and your only contempt for my post is it made reference to the xpac dual spec originates while the logic flew over your head, either willfully, or you just can’t see the forest through the trees.
Oh good, well I’ll just ignore your comment then since it’s irrelevant.
Dual spec is necessary to deal with how dead the game is until you reach tempest keep dungeons, heroics, and raids
The grind to reach that point is magnified by the diminished player pool, and they should be given the flexibility of dual spec to deal with how the a smaller player pool means exponentially more issues with finding tanks and healers
Tbc private servers have implemented systems like this to deal with their lower player counts and top heavy nature
1 Like
Yeah, you know the buzzwords but dont know how to frame them in a way that doesnt make you look like a complete tool. I mean, the whole “its no changes” thing has been thoroughly debunked 2893 times already and Im not going over it again for yet another 10 post alt coming in out of left field after 6 months of discussion. Do your homework.
Also, I dont have to tell you why dual specs dont need to be in TBC. All I need to do is point to the fact that TBC had no dual specs, the original TBC devs were against dual specs and that TBCC the recreation of TBC doesn’t need dual specs either. The game plays just fine without dual specs. Proof? TBCC is here and it doesnt have dual specs. Wrath, which didnt exist when TBC first came around, is not even remotely relevant to the discussion. Maybe you can reference it as an aside but Wrath having dual specs doesnt mean anything when it comes to TBC.
Its actually on you to tell me why you want and/or need dual specs in TBC but let me save you the trouble and remind you there is not a single thing you can say that is going to surmount the fact that TBCC doesnt need dual specs. You dont have an argument - you have an entitled request.
It would behoove you to go forward with it as a request cuz you sure as hell dont have any kind of argument.
4 Likes
Just thought I would put this out there, got soup for the souk and the one that got away (both negrand fishing and cooking)
Had bad luck on the fishing and took 23 fishings to fish it up
Still finished in 8 min and 23 seconds.
Didn’t do the bombing run one today though.
People aren’t “railing against dual spec”. The opposition isn’t to the feature existing.
The opposition is to inserting the feature into this specific version of the game… context dude. I mean, I oppose space combat in TBC too but love Eve, because it doesn’t fit here in this game and it does fit into Eve.
Edit: Really interesting when non level 70 single post toons pop up with really lax arguments like this and get likes from people who admit point blank to be only interested in garnering bumps for the issue to pressure the devs into giving it to them …
1 Like
This is true However I guess the other point of that is dual spec has already been put in the game And by the time they finally put in trispect we were already in the specialization system.
Is that the other half of that And I can also see blizzard putting in dual speck a lot more than try