Dual Spec.. please?

I can’t stop you claiming that I keep doing this. I wish I could but I can’t stop you lying.

I never said “that’s the way it should be because that’s the way it was” - you are literally making that up.

I said that dual spec contradicts the stated developer intention for respeccing.

Design implementation and design intention are not the same thing and you are wrongly conflating the two.

4 Likes

Then stop doing it? No one is denying dual spec wasn’t in TBC originally.

The argument is whether it should be in TBC Classic

And since now is not back then, that’s the way it shouldn’t be.
#ZiryusWantsAllChanges.

3 Likes

I know. And I am not claiming that as a reason not to change it.

I am claiming that, unlike other changes, this specific change actually breaks the intended purpose of the existing mechanic. It doesn’t fix an exploit or address an unintended result of the old mechanic in a new context - it literally breaks the intended design goal of the mechanic working exactly in the way it is intended.

Now here’s another important bit - it does so with very little evidence of benefit to the game in my view. It is conceivable that a change should be added that breaks a design goal of the original. But there is a higher burden to establish benefit in such cases in my opinion. A burden you haven’t come anywhere close to reaching in this case in my view.

Of course you will now take all the nuance out of that and reduce it incorrectly to “#nochanges at all costs”.

This conversation is like you grabbing my knee and repeatedly headbutting it while I try and pull away, all the while crying out “stop kneeing me in the head! Look I’m being assaulted!”. When I claim I’m not and tell you to stop making it up you claim I’m contradicting myself. Next level absurdity.

2 Likes

By now it should be painfully clear that there are some entities in this conversation whos’ only goal ia to win the argument by simply driving the other side insane, and trying to get us to stumble over word choice or semantics.

You and I both know who those actors are. I unignored them today, as I’m going to attempt to look at every post they make for what it is, purposeful gaslighting.

4 Likes

Where did you get that idea?

Oh… :rofl:

Yes I do Is in fact I’m actually the main tank for my Is Guild now granted or a casual Guild but I’m still the And I’m an officer.

Does that answer your question

Yes thank you.

I tank and dps in TBC, one of the perks of being a druid. On alts I would love to tank/heal/dps which dual spec would very much help with.

1 Like

Is which is why I’m trying so hard to get it in the game When a feature Would help that many people there’s no reason not to have it in.

1 Like

There is a reason, because you’re completely ignoring all the people it hurts.

Do you even know what the ratio is? Do you have any finger on the pulse of how many want it and how many don’t?

1 Like

Nobody will be hurt by Dual Spec.

You are a liar.

1 Like

Nobody will be hurt by not adding it.

1 Like

I guess it’s good we never predicated any argument on that basis, then. :+1:

2 Likes

You’ve never made any argument other than #somechanges. :roll_eyes:

1 Like

I could say the same exact thing I know almost every single person I talk to on my Server This would be one million percent in favor of dulswack I also know.

The reason why there’s a lot less people posting about it is because I just don’t think blizzard would listen.

As far as people it hurt At that point that’s Opinion Because I would really question who does it hurt quite frankly.

Do tell how It goes quite frankly it doesn’t Is there is no real part of the player base it really actually hurts.

As far as idea I’ve seen plenty of Poles I’ve seen plenty of evidence to say that Just as many people that do want it don’t want it if I’m giving my estimate I would say is about 50/50.

Because realistically Is any poll I could say or voting thing or whatever you want to call it on the Internet you could always make the argument well that’s easily altered.

So do tell Is what player does it actually hurt?

It’s because it’s not hardcore and it’s not casual Is the only player base I actually see that would technically cough cough hurt if you want to call it that.

This would be the people that say I don’t want it in the game because it wasn’t in the game originally.

Is plain and simple

That’s not true, I’ve repeatedly posted Delimicus’s thread (which also has 500+ likes on it) showing how the majority of the community wants it.

But you don’t pay attention to what people write.

You don’t read what other people write. But you still respond to it.

Which is why you’re dishonest.

2 Likes

Hahahahahahahahahaha.

This is quite possibly the funniest thing I’ve ever seen you type.

Your only argument is #somechanges. You have nothing else. Every time you try, it’s some variation of #somechanges, kicking the buck to Blizzard’s ability or open window to “do what they want” as if that somehow justifies dual spec.

It’s all you got.

It hurts the product that I was advertised and makes it worse at what I was promised it would be. You’re taking away my dual-spec-less TBC permanently, with no other alternative available. Meanwhile, you have alternatives that have multi-speccing functionalities.

Why don’t you just ask for a season of the legion after TBCC and get all your little fun-changes added to it, like season of mastery, instead of ruining things that other people like, like a selfish brat?

2 Likes

You were advertised a product that might have changes, blizzard made it real clear up front TBC Classic could and would have changes.

Trying to pull the #nochanges card just doesn’t work like it did for Classic.

You have a very very easy alternative to dual spec, don’t go to the trainer and get dual spec.

1 Like

Okay, will do so…

:thinking:

2 Likes