I never ever used that argument and the fact that you constantly lie about what I’ve said - is you being dishonest and not me being contradictory.
You literally are inventing words I never said and claiming I said them over and over. Your post is nothing but propaganda.
It’s hard to argue with people that are literally making up what you claim. I don’t hold the position you and Kumasama claim that I hold. I never have.
You realise they’ve backed themselves in a corner. If they ever don’t like a change they’re now contradicting themselves and supporting #nochanges by their own standard.
I wonder if they support my proposition that we should change respecing so that each respec should cost 1000g?
Then you’re contradicting yourself and you’re for #nochanges!
By the way the argument I am using here is utter incoherent gaslighting rubbish, and it is exactly the position you have held against me for months now.
He is directly claiming I support no change on the basis that I have claimed that I don’t support one specific change. He is wrongly conflating my contention that design intention is an important factor with proposing anything that differs from the original implementation.
It’s a dumb argument and you know it - whether you admit it or not.
(edited - I used the wrong wording here originally - accidently wrote “opposing” instead of “proposing” - which means the opposite of what I intended)
Actually I’m not claiming you support no changes, I’m claiming you hypocritically use #nochanges against a change you don’t like but can’t actually argue against. You don’t want to be accused of that stop using that’s the way it was an an argument.
