I don’t insult people straight out, I’ll mock them if they’re deserving though (right now this list is ~4 people long). You’re free to put my own words in front of me though to prove me wrong.
1 Like
Which is far more than arguments against dual spec have 
1 Like
Oh yes in Ziryus-land, we all already know, there is 0 arguments for not wanting dual spec. Not a single one. Yup.
3 Likes
You are welcome to provide one, it’s not on me to provide one as I’m not the one claiming there’s a problem with dual spec.
And BTW I have acknowleded your #nochanges position, it’s just not a valid reason in Blizzard’s eyes. So do better.
1 Like
I would say you’re free to quote one argument you made to the points I brought up in my post but I just quoted your whole response to me. It’s nothing but straight out insults. It’s what you do. It’s who you are. Every person against dual spec should be embarrassed to have you on their side and I’m sure some are.
2 Likes
Those aren’t insults…I’m just stating my observation based on your attitude towards the game.
It’s clear to see that you were offended though, so I’m sorry.
However, I cannot retract my sentiment that you come off as a lazy player that nobody would want to group with in PvP. It’s just a matter of gauging player dedication in relation to how much effort one would put in to actually playing well. Like you said, there’s nothing inherently wrong with being casual…but people who play just a bit harder than you likely don’t want to play with you.
Frankly, I’d say you’re the one being a slight bit more condescending in this case.
And please…let’s relax on the “it’s who you are” kinda stuff…you don’t know the first thing about me. Nor would I claim to know the first thing about you. I’m only making estimations as to your gameplay based on your attitude.
2 Likes
You seem to think anyone who wants dual spec is a bad lazy player.
Which you have nothing to back up with. And unfortunately classic doesn’t have armory so we can’t see if you yourself are actually a terrible player.
2 Likes
I’m just making observations based on the quality of your posts. It’s clearly who you are here. I generally think that who people are when they are anonymous is who they are. If they’re different in the real world when anonymity isn’t an option they’re hiding their true nature.
Fact is I’ve been asked to heal groups in pvp many times by friends. Your desperate attempts to insult are simply wrong.
I’m not offended. It’s not possible for you to offend me. I just think it’s good to point out who someone is based upon a clear pattern of actions.
1 Like
Well, some people have the aptitude to police themselves here because they want to avoid a forum vacation. Keep that in mind too.
1 Like
Yeah, it’s likely he’s less rational and even more insulting in other anonymous spaces than he is here.
2 Likes
Whatever you say, pal 
Just a casual glance at you right out demonstrates pretty clearly that your jimmies are rustled unspeakably.
But…have at it. If you want to continue to be rude instead because your favorite non-tbc feature hasn’t made it in to tbcc go right on ahead, doubt it wins you any points towards getting it implemented though.
1 Like
What will be more telling is your reaction if dual spec does get added.
1 Like
No problem!
Let this be a testament of how long you’ve been begging, how insignificant your demands and yourselves are, and another check mark to add to the endless list of failures you’ve all accomplished.
1 Like
Just be mindful you watch what you say this time or else you might be forced to take another forum vacation. 
1 Like
1 Like
More like,
1 Like
Your continued bringing up this subject is clear that my pointing out that you respond with nothing but insults because you’re not capable of coming up with a rational response has cut you to the quick. That’s likely because how ever much you deny it to yourself deep down you know it’s who you are. It’s not unusual for other people to see you better than you see yourself. Some people live in denial and often feel hurt when they are forced to see the truth of who they really are.
Yet for some reason you think calling players lazy sub par players that nobody wants to play with is a good argument for your side. I know I called you ignorant but in addition it’s clear you’re delusional as well
1 Like
Im saying its not black and white and some changes have been and will be made but doesnt mean all must be.
You cant just be like “Well they added Seal of the Martyr and 16:9 so clearly dual spec and anything else i feel ‘benefits’ me should be added”
1 Like
Which is not an argument anyone is using.
It merely shows that #nochanges is a garbage argument and the argument against dual spec needs to be made on its own merits.
It’s not a nochange argument when stating dual spec goes against the very design goals and intents of tbc, and then giving a quite from a blue from tbc saying NO to multi spec.
‐---------
This is an argument of you shouldn’t try to change pie into cake and then still try to call it a pie. There are fundamental things that you cannot change about a pie without making it nolonher a pie. Nochanges is the idea that NOTHING should be changed, the argument above is not arguing no changes, it’s arguing that this is tbcc and to be a classic of tbc it needs to follow and respect the origional game design to SOME degree and the line for the degree it should be respected is that it should still follow the design goals and intents of the origional game.
There is very clear evidence dual spec goes directly against the design goals and intents of tbc. So again, this is not about no changes, it’s about not changing the game in a direction the origional creates of the game didn’t want it to go.