Seems VERY clear that hes trying to pivot into that point
1 Like
No he is proving your #nochanges argument is garbage, a very very not subtle difference.
1 Like
Try again lol
1 Like
And yet the argument isn’t nochanges.
It looks like your intellectual dishonesty is showing again.
1 Like
So what exactly is your #nochanges argument?
1 Like
#SomeChanges
1 Like
It’s not nochanhes at all.
But this has been explained to you. You are just an Intellectually dishonest troll.
1 Like
Yes and it’s been explained to you that if you want to use #nochanges against dual spec you are a hypocrite if you are fine with other changes.
1 Like
You (and your caught Red handed lying friend Kanshua) spend most of your time arguing that we don’t hold the position we claim to hold and that we should hold a position you admit is defeated.
Basically you’re trying desperately to shoehorn our position into a “no change” position that very few if any people are actually arguing for. A strawman.
3 Likes
Except that you continually fall back on some variation of that’s how it was in TBC originally.
IE #nochanges
1 Like
Um no I don’t. My point is that your argument that WoTLK is evidence of compatibility with TBCC is not a given. There are too many differences with the versions.
I’m not arguing that no changes can exist, I’m arguing that you can’t simply defend a change on the basis that it existed in a different expansion.
I think your refusal to acknowledge the distinction coupled with your cosying up to a proven liar are evidence of your intellectual dishonesty in this discussion. At least others have had the good sense to keep their distance from someone caught out lying.
2 Likes
You consistently fall back on well that’s how it was in TBC as an argument against dual spec, IE #nochanges
You have also refused to explain why dual spec won’t work in TBC. All you have to do is explain the exact reasons why dual spec won’t work in TBC but you refuse to do so.
You can’t make a single actual in game argument about why dual spec is bad.
1 Like
The reasons have been given, you ignore them every single time.
Well no they’ve been responded to with countering arguments.
1 Like
replying with a countering arugment doesnt mean points havent been made. You cant debunk someones argument just because you disagree
No IE #somechanges. Just because its a faithful recreation of TBC doesnt mean that NOTHING will be changed. But that also doesnt mean that we change anything at a whim. Its pretty easy to understand honestly. Things are not black and white. Just because we want it to be a faithful recreation doesnt mean we are against any and every change. But we also dont have to be for them either
He has and so have I. you can choose to agree or disagree but you cant say that the points havent been made
2 Likes
Replying with a countering argument means the point has been countered.
So sure you took the little big horn, but how did that turn out?
That you refuse to debate those counter arguments just shows you have no real argument.
2 Likes
Yes but that doesnt mean that the points havent been brought up. You keep saying “we have no argument” but youre just countering (which is fine) but that doesnt dispute the whole argument because no one here can be “right” without proof which none of us can provide because dual spec hasnt been implemented
We’ve debated it plenty of times
1 Like
Exactly, and you can’t come up with an argument that ultimately demonstrates why dual spec is bad.
1 Like
Dual spec would be nice but I’m not sure if I’d want Blizz to start changing TBC too much. I know Lich King will bring a lot of quality of life features like TBC did if they even release down the road. I would like to enjoy Lich King because I feel like that was peak “classic wow” before they did the whole “balancing” thing with the game.
I can you present a “counter argument” which is basically just you disagreeing with my perspective of why it would be bad and say “you have no argument against it” which i do you just dont agree and we go in circles because you dont know how to have a discussion without lying
3 Likes