Dual Spec.. please?

Lol, as if there’s manipulation going on here…

Bumping a thread is not going to get you dual spec. I’m here to make anti-dual spec sentiment known, just as you’re here to make pro-dual spec sentiment known. It’s no more complicated than that.

I’ve never claimed to be inside their head but we have…literal direct quotes on the subject of dual spec (during TBC). It’s not propaganda or rationalization. Blizzard made their opinion on it clear, with no help from me or anyone else.

We can make a reasonable inference from the statements made, that pretty much definitively make clear that dual spec was not in the cards for TBC when it was designed.

1 Like

You really don’t get it. I don’t like you. I don’t care what you post. I’m not at all interested in your opinions. I find them laughable. You can’t insult me because you mean nothing to me. All I care about is keeping the thread on the front page. Thank you for helping me do that.

Lol oh god this is very sad.

Remember that almost 4000 post thread about “we want fresh servers” that people were constantly posting on to keep it on the front page and right up top, demanding a blue post and saying “it has to get a response with this much interest”?

That thread is dead, and not one single blue post or even a thought from Blizzard on it. They don’t care. It was hilarious to watch and read some of the contents though.

This will be the same thing. People will “bump til blue, Blizzard please please please” and silently see themselves out.

But hey, you keep making sure it’s right there up top. Good job. If I had a gold star handy if stick it on your forehead.

3 Likes

I think it’s amusing that you use an ice cream analogy yes no one’s saying vanilla is better than strawberry however If you have an ice cream parlor you give people variety which is what duel speck would allow.

The one in charge for the game, who ever that currently is or will be in the near future.

And like Ziryus already said, the devs who were in charge for original TBC were also the one who added dual spec in the first place, right? :slight_smile:

If you applaud my honesty, why do you doubt the intentions and reasonings? You come up with the ice cream argument, but that would only be permissible if dual spec had a negative impact on the game, and in this regard there has only been one tiny argument so far (off meta specs), but that problem also exists even without dual spec.

So the question again: How would dual spec have a direct negative impact on your gaming experience? As long as you are not a gold seller, there is no such thing in my opinion! And being a gold seller is not a legitimate reason!

You are right when you think we want our ingame life to be easier, but that is not a reason against it, especially when it helps the game because more people play the content they enjoy. If they are forced into content they don’t enjoy, they quit the game. You want proofs for that? That is exactly what happened to retail.

1 Like

And I keep telling you there’s no way in hack you can get those dailies done in 10 Is as a tank Is or a healer.

Let alone I want to see how many people can solo that escort quest if you can even get to begin with assuming it’s not still uncool down.

I think your being honest and I think you’re wrong.

I’ve raised a few points what about 30 or 40 times now in the past. I won’t detail them now again and I won’t defend them but here’s a few of them in point form - for like the umpteenth time:

  1. It makes open world content easier and more convenient to clear solo through allowing you to easily switch to the optimal build for it - thus acting as a disincentive for grouping up.

  2. It allows people to optimise for for specific raid content if they min max in ways that aren’t as viable now due to not being as time efficient - therefore leading to class stacking imbalances and such.

  3. the increase in efficiency for grouping and clearing content means we burn through content faster and will have a content droughts sooner.

I’ve raised many other risks which you have ignored every single time. I’ll not raise them again any time soon - I’m literally bored to tears with responding to the same questions in the same way over and over and over again just to pad your little petition…

1 Like

:rofl:

No need to whine about your real life here…

No. Because you said one thing and said another thing that was in direct opposition to that other thing. Hence, a contradiction.

See how I don’t need to write 100 sentences to make sense of it all?

Because he constantly contradicts himself. He has goldfish memory and can’t remember anything he has written previously to writing the next thing.

Because you are so threatened by my comments that you have to continually trash my character without any basis at all. Your argument is so bankrupt that slander is all you’ve got.

1 Like

Well no, you’ve been given ample opportunity to explain the actual problem with dual spec and how it would negatively impact the game. You have refused to do so and fall back on vague hypotheticals which simply don’t make sense, and while claiming to not be #nochanges routinely fall back on #nochanges when pressed because you are unable to come up with anything else.

Slander would imply that what’s said about you isn’t true.

Literally just dot pointed it above and immediately back on cue we’re in ground hog day again. You guys are so full of BS it’s amazing - it’s like talking to a flat earth forum.

Anyway - im done with this for tonight - sick of having people playing head games for now.

1 Like

Slander would also indicate I’m directly attacking his character somehow by making blatantly negative illustration.

All I’m doing is pointing out that when he makes his extra-long responses, one after the other, he doesn’t seem to recall what information he puts in each and every responses because if he did he’d notice that much of this hypothetical diatribes don’t mesh together.

Hence, the contradictory nature of it all.

Good example of the contradictory nature of his responses.

There are multiple dailies that do not require combat.

Cooking and fishing are the easiest examples. And those yield 15 raw gold a day, plus mats and vendor items.

3600+ posts later, and the devs aren’t responding. maybe they’re just not that into the idea. take the hint

2 Likes

I said separate things that had no causal relationship and were not contingent on each other which you thought were contradictions because you don’t understand how implication and causality work. There was no contradiction. The issue is that you don’t understand how logical statements work.

Like to this degree - if I said I take the train sometimes and then later said I’m not on the train every day you would claim that is a contradiction (applying the same standard you apply to me) - and you would be flat wrong.

BTW I don’t think you are this ignorant. I think you pretend to be for your petition - to pad out replies.

5 Likes

Your mental gymnastics are almost as funny as your attempting to cover yourself using reams and reams of vague sophistry to turn around a contradiction.

90 of those posts are yours. Stands to reason if the devs aren’t responding you wouldn’t have anything to be concerned about yourself. Yet you still respond and bump the thread for some reason.

1 Like