Are you sure all of those are bugs? Some of them probably are, but I find it extremely hard to believe they all are.
Not everything everyone complains about is an actual bug.
That depends. Do you mean bug as in “due to the sh1tty port that we are playing”? Idk, I’m sure some of them are working very much as intended- i.e. not at all like Vanilla.
Ahahahah, I take it you never read the bug report forum? Those were literally off the top of my head. I could write you a novel of all the well-established, non-Vanilla bugs that exist in this game right now.
We’re both making assumptions we cannot prove. Imo the likely truth is that 120 has classic alts. You just assume they don’t. Many of them likely played vanilla when that was all there was. I played 4 alts through vanilla, bc,and wrath before there was a cata. And I have a 32 classic hunter and several level 10 classic alts.
It’s a weak argument to attack someone over the avatar they use.
The only reason I don’t laugh at those who post on their classic alt is I give them the benefit of the doubt that they have more. I think it’s likely that most of the classic alts posting here have higher level retail alts. But if they didn’t play through vanilla, bc, or wrath when they were live they don’t have the knowledge or experience to make relevant comments.
And I think that’s so obvious that it can’t be argued
Dual spec is a band-aid. They ought to just remove talent trees altogether and give all of the bonuses contained in them by default. Then adjust it so everybody can tank and charge for it, too. And put graveyards next to where people die a lot.
I have. And people post a lot of things that aren’t at all bugs.
Well none of us can really claim to be an authority on that seeing as we’re relying on 13 year old memories and hyper pixelated videos posted on YouTube in 2005. Like it or not Blizzard has the only true reference client and is the only real authority on vanilla authenticity.
This post is a waste of space here
Lol Blizzard shill detected. Attempt to gaslight the community all you like, but I hope you’re at least well paid.
What a troll. What you are suggesting would change a lot more then you think in classic. While I’d love to be able to swap specs it would change what vanilla was. That and it’s just kicking the door wide open for more “quality of life” features to be brought in so you plebs can make classic into retail -
“you can’t prove it’s a bug, so it’s not one” That’s called gaslighting, sport. I can tell you never actually read the bug report forums. 0/10 dumpster tier troll
INC all the LOW IQ #nochanges spammers
I like how this post de-railed from dual-spec. Very entertaining.
1 Like
That’s not called gaslighting I think you need to look up the definition of that word. That’s asking for evidence before jumping to conclusions.
Let me show you an example. Warlocks are freaking out and calling the infernal ‘glitched’ or ‘bugged’ because it isn’t instantly killing all the lowbies around them. Whats your opinion on this? Do you think this is a change or a bug?
Woah hold on now, my infernal attacks only me when I summon him. Not sure if that’s a bug though. After the time limit runs out of course, but that’s to be expected.
Bug. I did this many times back in the day. Here, I’ll post on my lock.
Do you have a reference client? Do you have any actual proof that what you’re claiming to be a bug is?
I’m not saying Classic doesn’t have bugs. I know it does. I find the mana burn on druids in feral forms to be particularly annoying. But there is a lot of stuff we just can’t verify and we have to rely on Blizzard to sort out. That’s just the way it is like it or not.
The better question is “Does Blizzard have a reference client?” WOD mount speed calculations and TBC+ item patches point to NOPE.
Yes, they do.
Prove they have an accurate 1.12 reference client. I’ll be waiting.
It’s a bug. Or a “change” (bug that Blizzard doesn’t want to fix).
LMAO ahahaha.