When will Blizzard learn. Whenever possible if they are changing a form given the option to have the old form. It is not like the game is 100% updated so some throwbacks would be okay in my opinion.
5 Likes
There is one criticism Iâll make against the new form and that is I wish the colors werenât as muddied.
I like the new cheetah form! The old cat had corgi qualities. I think the old should be an option though.
You like it and thatâs fine. But others shouldâve had the CHOICE.
Exactly!
Itâs always been a cheetah. Travel Form was implemented when they implemented this auto travel crap and took away our separate buttons. And when they turned it into a glyph, it was also called cheetah.
Yes, please and thank you.
4 Likes
Never said you SHOULDNâT
1 Like
Thatâs what I was asking, and also pointed out that the new glyph is called cheetah. Iâm just curious if the old one was ever named cheetah in any way except by the playerbase. The spell was called travel form.
Side note, I also think they should offer both options. At this point Iâm not sure why they ever remove anything cosmetic from the game. Itâs going to displease at least some players.
The old âcheetahâ form looked NOTHING like a cheetah. It was horrible and had N64 levels of polygon count. It was unacceptable and shouldnât have been in the game as long as it has.
The new cheetah form is fantastic. One of the best druid forms so far. Looks like an actual cheetah (look one up, OP), and even has whiskers.
Wish i could fight in that form.
2 Likes
You can take it from my cold, dead hands. I love it.
Thatâs actually the old glyph. Itâs been around forever, so yeah. It was called cheetah before the update.
1 Like
Nuts theys be, but just a Lilâ bit. 
Yeah, Iâm on the ânew formâ side on this one. Folks asking for a glyph to return to the old form, to me, might as well ask for a âGlyph of 2004â graphics for the Druid. Just doesnât make sense in 2022.
1 Like
Never said you never said, either. It was just emphasis for the entire thread. 
I literally specifically told you it was. 
Agreed.
It makes perfect sense. You like new, we like old. It doesnât affect you. This affects us.
3 Likes
you people complain about everything. uninstall
The progression of time sadly affects us all. 
The reality of it just may be that the old forms are just going to be a selling point of future versions of âClassicâ style of WoW.
i dont think anyone asking for a low res model is serious
1 Like
The old one looked like it was from mario 64.
Even though Iâm not the biggest fan of the new cheetah, I think one thing I donât want is for animals in azeroth to be exact copies of animals on earthâŚin fact, that goes for lots of stuff in the game, not just animal forms.
One of the coolest thing for Druid shapeshifting art (since warcraft 3 - take a look at Samewise Didierâs work) is that the animal forms had their own unique twistâŚTake bears for example - they look more like monsters to me than a traditional grizzly in Montana. Thatâs one of the things that makes Azeroth feel like its own alien universe when you log in. Itâs supposed to be like that since this is a fantasy. 
I think blizz should continue to do their own thing when it comes to art, and we should allow/encourage their artists to have the freedom to use their imaginations to the fullest extent. So iâm happy this form isnât an exact replica of a cheetah from irl Earth.
That being said, I wish they would stop removing stuff from the game - they should never have removed the old cheetah glyph, because they should understand there are players that prefer some of those older low res models for various reasons. This includes armor/weapons. 
3 Likes
This post does nothing but prove the new model is better lmao.
How on earth do you think the first one looks more like a cheetah?
8 Likes
lets bring back all the old models too! 
I just donât understand.
âHey team, letâs do an update to the cheetah formâ
âYou got it boss, here you goâ
âWhy doesnât this look like a cheetahâ
âBecauseâŚart. Itâs our own little spin on itâ
ââŚ.â
It literally does look like a cheetah.