Don't Ban for Poor Game Design | AFK BG groups

That’s an interesting idea. It feels a bit like trying to force people to have fun though. Bad design acting as a bandaid on top of bad design…

I do like the idea of where you’re going, but I suppose it still isn’t clear to me precisely what the problem is (or problems) are. I suppose that the point that some others are making is that AFKing isn’t the problem but rather a symptom of a problem. So what is that problem?

Are people who quit for being suspended for cheating really the type of people who contribute to a healthy community?

1 Like

Yep. And I think blowouts like this should definitely be rewarded additionally…such as denying the marks for the other side. Maybe even giving the winner a 4th mark when that happens.

Yeah…but there should be some type of creative solution for a non-creative problem.

The problem is that losing games fast on purpose produces “fast marks”.

I don’t think it’s a singular problem. Laziness is one issue. People have gotten better over the past several expansions at finding the path of least resistance.

A system that allows it to some extent is another problem. I’ve seen tons of good and bad ideas over the years from the forums. Seems like Blizzard could sit down and have a brainstorm for a week or two with their top minds and come up with a fix.

Maybe not. Maybe they have and just can’t fix it. Maybe they don’t care. I dunno.

So what? Things change with time.

The fact of the matter is it’s a design problem that could easily be corrected.

If you want to fix a large problem in battlegrounds, make it less likely for full premades to match up against full pugs.

There is no challenge in organized vs unorganized.

Many games with matchmaking systems simply will not match your premade group with pug group, you will sit in queue and wait for a team of equal size to queue, or similar size.
That will fix a lot of the issues.

Let random BGs be random, and organized be organized.

2 Likes

do alot of people even know they’re cheating? there’s bg groups all day that will tell you that you can’t get banned from it i spoke to people individually after knowing what the punishment can be and other people stopped doing it. It’s part of blizzards fault not even telling people that it’s bannable premade groups in classic previously rolled over when they saw it was another premade in classic because it wasn’t worth the time - honor ratio but no one got banned. It’s been a thing all of classic to a certain degree but blizzard never did anything to anyone for this so how would players even know they could get banned?

Opportunistic behavior will always exist no matter what. But the punishments are sound and valid.

The structure would be better served to changed. Get rid of marks, allow honor to be earned via Arena. Not a total solution but at least there are less people in bg’s who don’t want to be there to begin with.

Some people are incredibly dumb, when it comes to thinking that as long as they just perform some mental gymnastics, they’re safe.

Yes, they do. i personally know two people who got suspensions for 8 days and this was 3 months ago.

Your opinion of this isn’t really relevant. I already know this happens. I also warned people on these forums last week to stop. Anyone who wants to keep doing it can but don’t cry when you get suspended too.

I’ve given my opinion this many times to where it’s like a broken record but I will say a few things #1 it doesn’t matter if people AFKed in the past, it’s always been against the spirit of gameplay. it’s the equivalent of botting etc and other types of cheating and #2 I played so many BGs in Classic that I saw firsthand what the suspensions did. they made BGs better. When someone has to explain to their guild that their account is suspended and they can’t make the raid on Tuesday they stop. it is hands down, the best way of handling the AFK problem IMO. That’s not to say changes shouldn’t be made, but that stick is there for a reason.

As for the topic, it is clear why the OP is fighting to have this not be actionable (this won’t happen, by the way, the multiboxers outcried and they pay for multiple subs and that still is getting suspensions. AFK suspensions are already happening. There is no debate.) for two reasons. First of all, he liked going against these groups and getting easy honor/marks (reading between the lines), and secondly, he is afraid of the horde queues getting to 30+ minutes (directly stated in a reply).

Translation - Our cheating should be rewarded by having our activist demands met.

2 Likes

This same logic can be applied to botting, flyhacking and other forms of win-trading.

This is even worse than suggesting marks be removed for ALL losses.

You must have learned the word “activist” recently-- you use it every other sentence.

Just saying… lol.

Horde Queue times a year ago was 2 hours in AV because of false narrative that the AV map favoured the Horde.

It applies in this situation as this is the primary driving force behind the actions.

It’s not actually optimal to get 0 honor per game and a slow mark as the opposition choose to slowroll their opponents instead of win when they realize what they are up against.

The entire action of AFKing premades is the message being sent. Nothing more.

Actually having vastly superior racials in one of the most faction tilted expansions are how you increase horde waiting times to over an hour. I hope it gets worse for them too.

I want them to make arenas faction divided too, but can’t always get what you want.

I dont think that would do anything, people on both sides would just watch a timer and as soon as the limit was passed then proceed as usual

False narrative spreads like wildfire, and this is a prime example of another…

Nobody is getting banned. Stop lying, stop trying to bully people. The only activism I see here is people posting bullcrap on reddit about suspensions that happened a LONG time ago during R14 grinds, and even those details are SKETCHY at best.

Just stop lying, until blizzard announces something, let it go.

And the entire concept of “Marks per hour” goes out the window and they might as well pug their games.

I wonder how many of the people here complaining about people intentionally losing games are the same people who stop spawning after I sapper them at BS. I feel like I should start reporting anyone who finishes with fewer than 5 deaths.

1 Like