DK Red Eyes Option

And no, I just stumbled upon this thread when looking up whether or not my void elf DK would be able to use the “dark ranger” red eyes eye color customization unlocked from Genn’s quest in Oribos, and decided I wanted to pitch in and necro the thread. :rofl:

Game’s in maintenance right now, so debating whether or not to focus on that quest based on whether or not I’ll be able to use them on my DK, or just on my other void elf alts.

1 Like

But hey, yeah. - Red, green, purple and non-glowing eyes for DKs, purple eyes and stitched-shut eyes for Demon Hunters, let’s get on it Blizz. :heart: :mega:

2 Likes

Wish he’d ignore more people imo

I don’t remember if I’ve posted in this thread yet but some DK eye options already exist if you are a night elf, you can use night warrior eyes.

3 Likes

That’s cool to know, gonna have to try and see if the red eyes work on void elf DK, after maintenance is over.

Will come back and reply if that’s the case, the san’layn RP value would be huge.

1 Like

They don’t, sadly. Right now it seems just night warrior.

But that itself acts as a precedent so if nelfs can why not others?

Personally don’t see a reason to limit character expression

That does not mean that talent art is mandated to be monochromatic. You are literally making stuff up.

Yes it is. You do not know how to argue a point. Its fallacy after fallacy.

Not wrong because in game these do not show eye glow, but more specifically DK eye glow because the DK’s that have these face scars do have blue eye glow its just not in game.

Yet he actually has blue eyes.

A 3rd party program that doesnt represent the game… I really dont care.

You are saying a bunch of nonsense really. Lady Alistra isnt a DK. Get over it.

You can control yourself and not break the ToS, have fun being reported and put on ignore.

That isnt some, that is one option that was kept in because of a bug.

I thought you promised to ignore me

And even so, it is still existing in game and is a precedent

You are on ignore, but sometimes I like seeing the nonsense people are still trying to throw out.

Its not a precedent.

Does it exist

Has blizzard stated it is a bug they are actively trying to resolve

If it exists and is not actively being removed then it is a precedent for more than 1 color eyes for dks.

1 Like

Due to a bug.

They took it away and gave it back after you guys pitched a tantrum.

No its not.

that’s a precedent that they are willing to ignore lore to satisfy the player base

Congrats, you played yourself

5 Likes

No its not lol.

precedent

an earlier event or action that is regarded as an example or guide to be considered in subsequent similar circumstances.

You’re just being contrary as usual and I’m not sure why I keep responding to you

1 Like

I’m not talking about a 3rd party program like some Wowhead preview screen, I simply would rather not be misconstrued as “advertising” illegal private servers.

The game client has dozens of options of skin textures, eye colors and the likes that are 100% usable and function in the game, but are simply hidden, same way the eredar options for draenei don’t show up until after you do the quest to unlock them.

You’re extremely invested in replying to every post for someone who doesn’t care, though, which I find funny.

Hallelujah!

4 Likes

A bug doesnt make something a precedent lol.

Again Blizzard stated that the customization has to make sense.

Don’t celebrate too soon, he may still reply to you even after ignoring you

Morbid fascination, I wager.

That’s kind of my personal leg in all this, it’s just astounding to see how fixed in their own ways and contrarian some people can be.

It’s like the possibility of being wrong about something inflicts physical pain upon them, otherwise I genuinely can’t explain this particular kind of behavior pattern.

2 Likes

Lightforged. Draenei. Warlock.

:joy:

2 Likes

Nah, not going to, its kind of sad that someone with 8 posts gets ignored asap because they dont know how to control themselves. Not to mention lying about what I have said.