I don’t think its a bad idea to discuss “what is next” since as it stands we already know the content that will be released up to Naxx but not the timetable or how or if the game will progress after that. If discussion can lead to a general acceptance of what is preferred it gives Blizzard time to make it so, maybe.
So do you have TBC released in a #nochanges manner in which many of the issues brought up become valid. Do you ignore that and balance keeping the “spirit” of TBC alive while addressing some of the issues it created?
Personally I wouldn’t want Classic to follow the path it went on or split the player base by creating multiple versions. Instead use the concept of simplicity that Classic has, while utilizing the content(zones, dungeons, raids, etc) from later expansions but tune them for 60 and classic. Without the power creep of level cap increase, QoL changes which made the game more streamlined and detached, or the annoying amount of system creep and fluff… But that’s just me.
Maybe you can’t read very well let me repeat.
No one and I mean no one claimed anything balanced anything 100% completely. Only a dumb dumb would think this
Dude, your entire post is “Classic TBC will completely eliminate class population imbalances. Change my mind”
That was entirety of your post. I said actual TBC didn’t do that. Now you are moving the goalposts because your data doesn’t show what you claim.
Turns out you’re not Steven Crowder.
Yeah eliminating class imbalances isn’t the same thing as completely 100% making the classes equal.
Do you understand the difference?
My data shows exactly what I was saying
Actually, that is what it means. If you want a release of WoW where Blizzard tried to “eliminate class imbalance”, you should be lobbying for Classic Wrath.
That is the class homogenization release.
Well then how do you get anything done in the world if you’re going to take it THAT literally, honestly that’s thinking like a child.
If someone came in and took our national debt from 14 trillion to 1 million, I would safely say they balanced out the debt.
Same thing with what I’m saying, if a server is 80% horde and transfers takes it to 55%, then the transfers balanced out the server.
I mean if you want to get really literal like a child you go for it lol. I think it’s safe to assume no one was saying it’s 100% down to a T balanced, nothing is EVER that balanced in video games.
I do miss my BE ret pally. Horde ret Pallys are way more than just viable. Put them in a party with wind fury and they can easily out dps warriors. I was always in the top 5 dps in raids.
You don’t have any data to back up your claim.
Do I need to go back up and restate my claim for you? What do you think my claim was?
You don’t need to restate anything. I already know you’re full of it.
sure why not ask, keep askin, it seems to work, no matter how brainless the idea, Blizz doesn’t seem to keep it’s promises on anything regarding Classic and no changes.
Done trying, enjoy it.
PvP is the main reason, it’s the only real endgame long-term.
Okay clearly I do, tbc balanced out class populations drastically, proven by data. If you deny it that’s up to you, but it’s fact.
See my previous comments for my reaction to this.
Much rather tank or heal in TBC than vanilla.
2 Likes
So you deny factual data? Ok bud
Macros are for people that can’t press more than 2 keys
100% agree. Although I’m okay with healing in vanilla, and I HATE tanking in vanilla, neither of those roles even come close to how fun they are in tbc. Not to mention the diversity in these roles are a night and day difference from vanilla to tbc.
1 Like
Exactly. I’m going to level my druid to 60 in phase 5-6 so that I can tank and heal with him in TBC.
1 Like
xD that was my exact plan as well! Except I was going to go boomkin/resto.
Resto Druid tbc was one of the funnest time I’ve had in this game. (Besides holy Paladins in wotlk when they could go prot and hit 8k avengers shield).
1 Like