Good warriors still stance dance.
Only place MM used pets was in arena and that was because raptors apply a mortal strike effect and can assist with kiting
Playing survival for 18 years is wild bruh
This is asking a lot.
People online only do whatâs easy and requires minimal effort. This is why everyone replies to articles on Facebook only reading the title and looking at the image and not reading the actual article.
This is hilarious to me because more often than not the title contradicts what was actually said in the article. So replying the way they do does nothing but make them look like fools
Yea I donât know about that take.
Last time I played it. It felt very spammy. Everything was up at the same time. It didnât feel cohesive.
You are mashing bombs, mongoose strike, random butchery here and there. Then kill command for some reason.
It feels like a modernized old hunter build where it borrows aspects from other specs and doesnât quite pull them together for a full class identity.
And I would argue bm feels the most complete and fleshed out out of the three.
Mm has definitely needed a lot of work for many years now though.
I donât think of it as losing my pets. I think of it as not taking them on every adventure. Iâm one character with or without my pets. Either I take them (BM), or I leave them behind (MM) depending on the mission.
I know this is silly, but I just canât vibe with a spec built around using grenades in melee combat.
That is lie, pet was mostly not used in pve instance play, there where some boss fights in past where having a pet out was actually better than going lone wolf .Pet not being used /useful to mm is fabricated lie.
Name one.
Because the math ainât mathin.
Back in bfa as one example any boss that required heavy movement and did not have add phase where you could pad numbers with aoe.
I been playing SV lately, I kinda dig it.
What irks me about the spec is using WB in ST with Butchery in the mix to apply bleed, imagine if Arms/Outlaw had to use Cleave/Blade Flurry in ST. Feels a bit weird.
Probably did it to avoid making the rotation braindead, you would be juggling between Raptor/Mongoose and KC in ST if you didnât use WB and Butchery. That would get stale real fast.
Funny enough, arms for awhile. It was better to ww in single target because you could ww AND ww would also slam
So youâd just straight throw slam off your hotbar and use ww single or aoe.
And you still to this day use bladestorm as part of your single target opener.
I definitely feel it could use a little reworking to make it make a bit more sense.
I feel like butchery should also do like a beast cleave like thing too. I donât like how the pet is integrated into damage.
Demonstrably false.
Iâve never read a boddice ripper novel, but I can tell from the cover art, back summary, and the way my girlfriends go on about them - theyâre definitely a form of socially acceptable smut that isnât appealing.
Like when you cast Butchery your pet also AoE as well? Iâm still learning the spec so damage wise I have no idea how pet damage works outside of KC and its mastery.
True, however you canât simply walk by a store and claim you know the environment or the atmosphere of the store or the people inside.
A book is different in that you can get a general synopsis from the cover or even the short summary usually on the back.
Something like this however, you can have an idea of how it functions. But acting like that knowledge is first hand while stating it is a super negative thing is what makes it dishonest.
Sure you can. You can look in the windows, you can hear the music coming through the doors (if any), you can also just read the reviews of others. Nothing requires you to experience a thing to make a judgement call.
Survival is easier as it never been and thatâs completely terrible, rotation sucks now, it was EXTREMELY FUNNIER before the last 2 or 3 adjusts.
You have to be kidding me
The difference is making a judgement call vs exclaiming it IS a thing.
Like you can formulate opinions all day. But you canât actually know for sure until youâve actually experienced and seen it.
Like someone like me tha HAS done it for years can give a more honest opinion on it since Ive literally been in the trenches vs at the window looking in.
So itâs a âhow do you know?â kind of thing when you havenât stepped out of heroic dungeons.
Youâre focused on the act of sharing that judgement, vs the judgement itself.
You can absolutely pass judgement on something without ever having experienced it. You could debate whether that argument is fair or not, but in the case of the Mythic+ - the reputation of toxicity, the focus on meta comps or youâll be passed over, the fixation parses and IO scores - all of this can very easily be used to decide that the mode of gamplay is both difficult to enter and full of people you wouldnât want to deal with.
Yes, I agree. What I disagree with is the rampant use of âtoxicityâ by people who have never done the content.
Iâm not arguing against the above as a point of contention or reason for not wanting to partake. But the unfair labeling and buzzword with zero experience of the thing.