You are either intentionally evading the problem because you know it destroys your argument, or you simply didn’t consider it. Which is it? The problem here is really straight forward, and it showcases a lot of the reasons a lot of people feel Classic has been given undue amounts of preference at the expense of the Retail Version of the game.
When Classic Launched, the hard and fixed promise was “No transfers to any new servers.” That means if you want a BC character, and Blizzard is serious about honoring their statements and commitments; the resolution goes down one of three ways.
A.) You buy a Boost to 58 and level to 70.
B.) You level from 1-70 as every single Blood Elf and Draenei character was forced to.
C.) You can transfer from a Classic to a BC Server. With one. Critical. Caveat.
The Much Required Caveat: On the BC Servers, all Classic era end-game raids are disabled. That means no Naxx, AQ, ZG, etc. After all, you want to play "Pure BC Content" right? So why would you ever go back to Classic on a BC Server? Why indeed when after all, you can still play Classic on Classic?
…Or maybe it wasn’t ever about that. Maybe that logic never meant anything more than a warm pitcher of spit when the Classic Crowd raised it the first time. Maybe it was about you hoping to get a easier ride by moving to BC Servers?
Exactly.
See the issue I and a lot of other people have, is that people are being given essentially 2 versions of their character. Pretty sure that’s an affordance no player on Retail has ever been given. Maybe I didn’t want to play BFA. Maybe I wanted to stay on Legion, because BFA blew goat turds. I’m being hypothetical but the point stands.
It’s also dancing around the real problem that Lucidia nailed.
Feats of Strength. Speaking of them further showcases the hypocrisy of these moves by Blizzard. I agree with him, the Feats of Strength like Atiesh, Corrupted Ashbringer etc. etc. All of these things should remain just that. Feats of Strength.
Alas, the problem here is that in BC, ALL of these things remained very much attainable. Hell most players who got said items that they now cling to as “relics of skill”?
They got them during BC. Not legitimately during Classic. Don’t lie to me. I was around back then, and I’ve played the same characters for 17 years. So I do actually know what the rarity of certain items is. I also know how the ownership of those items spiked up with tons of new owners when BC launched.
Do you know why? Because a Warlock or Priest in Voidheart or Avatar is going to perform at 70 far superior to a Level 60 player in Tier 2. That’s just a simple fact. So saying a Feat of Strength won’t be cheapened with this decision is pure bulls***. I was able to Solo Stratholme as a BC Paladin once I had a Hammer of the Naaru. A Priest doing Redemption and Anathema? Easy at 70. It was not so easy at 60.
So really Blizzard, if your going to let Classic characters trade up and move to a newer version of the game, it’ll be outright hypocrisy if you allow Classic to BC, but won’t allow a Classic character to move to retail. Your only logic, that being the protection of “Feats of Strength” is shot to hell the minute you allow people to enter Naxxramas at Level 70.
Anyone who can’t see the why, is being intellectually dishonest.