Cash Shop implementation

[Falnear-wyrmrest-accord (Falnear)]

The items were added in december, landro was added in January before launch.

Actually he was added on the 25 of September 2007 with 2.2.0.

[Studmuffyn-veknilash (Studmuffyn)]

different dates for his addition from wowhead and wowpedia,lol,

[Frawshawk-laughing-skull]

All of them having nothing to do with the redemption.

[Falnear-wyrmrest-accord (Falnear)]

Which is still irrelevant as the items were not added till TBC. Unless you think that there was a version of vanilla with the level 70 talents trees and arenas.

[Studmuffyn-veknilash (Studmuffyn)]

actually yah,

How to redeem a loot card

[Frawshawk-laughing-skull]

They were implemented with the card game which launched in 2006. TBC did not launch till 2007. If you did not have access to hellfire peninsula and it was before the 16th of january, you were playing vanilla.

[Studmuffyn-veknilash (Studmuffyn)]

i dont really consider the pre patch either version.

[Falnear-wyrmrest-accord (Falnear)]

With this logic: if you never bought TBC, you were playing vanilla, regardless of the skills changes, talent trees designed for lvl 70, arena skirmishes that were available since December 2016 for lvl 60, etc. Even the actual patch # doesn’t mean anything, if you never bought TBC, 2.3.x is still vanilla for you.
Great logic.

[Frawshawk-laughing-skull]

This isnt quantum physics. It did not exist in two or more states. If it was before TBC launch it was vanilla.

[Fesz-cenarius]

@Frawshawk-laughing-skull

Your apology is appreciated. I think people just read responses and automatically assume they are negative. Such is the nature of an internet forum.

I’m guessing that particular poster feels the need to “redeem himself” in his own eyes after having been proven wrong on many occasions himself. I am apparently a tempting target because I among those that have proven him wrong.

Among those occasions:

False reporting and automated ban

Again, you’re trying to redefine it. Please tell me which dictionary definition mentions a Blacklist as possibly being a personal list for a single individual. Look up every single front page definition of Blacklist when you google “Blacklist definition.” blacklist noun [ C ] uk ​ /ˈblæk.lɪst/ us ​ /ˈblæk.lɪst/ ​ a list of people, countries, etc. who are considered by a particular authority or group to be unacceptable and who should be avoided and not trusted Group or Authority. “Author…

False reporting and automated ban

au·thor·i·ty Dictionary result for authority /əˈTHôrədē/ noun noun: authority; plural noun: authorities 1. the power or right to give orders, make decisions, and enforce obedience. "he had absolute authority over his subordinates" synonyms: power, jurisdiction, command, control, mastery, charge, dominance, dominion, rule, sovereignty, ascendancy, supremacy, domination; More influence, sway, the upper hand, leverage, hold, grip; informalclout, pull, muscle, teeth; informaldrag "he had absol…

False reporting and automated ban

au·thor·i·ty _**a person**_ or organization _having power or control in a particular_, typically political or administrative, _sphere_ In this case the administrative sphere over which the individual has contol or power is maintaining their own personal blacklist.

[Falnear-wyrmrest-accord (Falnear)]

Vanilla is exactly before 2.0.1 was installed. You can read the patch notes and see how the patch is referred to.

[Galdor-maelstrom (Galdor)]

I understand that you’re upset but there’s no need to be bringing up another thread into this topic. Please spend 30 seconds researching your claims before insulting people in the future.

[Frawshawk-laughing-skull]

Vanilla is fanbase coined term. Let me make my statement clearer. I had the items in my inventory before The Burning Crusade was implemented.

[Falnear-wyrmrest-accord (Falnear)]

Vanilla is fanbase coined term.

Riiiight…

I had the items in my inventory before The Burning Crusade was implemented.

No you hadn’t and there is empirical evidence that was provided in this thread.

[Fesz-cenarius]

The items had to be redeemed via webpage before he was added and were available in december. That was before TBC launch.

But never during vanilla, as the in game items were never present in any 1.x patch.

[Frawshawk-laughing-skull]

Fanterm, dont care, not arguing semantic further.
Weve completely derailed this thread.

[Morehwine-wyrmrest-accord (Morehwine)]

I believe that a cash shop could be implemented into classic by using the current market price for the old loot cards. That way there would be a scarcity to it while maintaining a revenue of income. I do not believe that adding the old Blizzcon pets should be implemented or the collector’s edition Diablo pets. It would allow people to purchase them to support the classic server and encourage blizzard to listen to the community, while at the same time to offset the cost of actually maintaining the server.

Ahem
So anyway, ignoring the mongolian clusterfark that the rest of this thread turned into. You basically want Blizzard to sell the old loot cards-- quibbling about the exact date of TBC release aside, most of which were not produced in vanilla-- based on market price. This pricing data would come from where? Ebay? Some kind of collector’s aggregate?
Would this be available to the modern players as well? Because if not, there will be howls of protest. This idea is really more suited to them than to Classic players TBH, in my humble opinion.

[Falnear-wyrmrest-accord (Falnear)]

@Frawshawk-laughing-skull

Fanterm, dont care, not arguing semantic further.

_http://web.archive.org/web/20110413010826/http://us.battle.net/wow/en/game/patch-notes/2-0-1

Look at the title of this “vanilla patch”. Maybe this site was also wrong? Also, I wonder why did Blizzard remove every patch note before halfway WoTLK from the official site.

[Frawshawk-laughing-skull]

That link is not pulling up anything but tides of vengeance. The scroll on the side only goes to 3.2

[Falnear-wyrmrest-accord (Falnear)]

That link is not pulling up anything but tides of vengeance. The scroll on the side only goes to 3.2

Really? You now pretend that you don’t see the whole link?