No. You have never responded to direct questions from me. I asked you specifically. Which is worse, what Trump said about Kapernick or what Biden said about the trial. You have never answered that question. You did, however, start insulting Trump and then got all offended when I called you out on this.
You then went into your history of service and essentially got offended that I would dare question your positions.
No, you were never insulted by me. Your overreaction to what I have said demonstrates how thin-skinned you are.
And I have given you the benefit of the doubt by choosing to take your word for it in terms of your service history, because I have no means of proving otherwise. And you were absolutely 100% espousing communism in your original post. Perhaps you did not intend to, but you did. Perhaps you need to be more careful in your statements in the future.
You have never directly refuted a single point I have made, you have instead chosen to get angry with me and start name-calling. Thatās your response. Which is pretty typical of those on the left end of the spectrum which you clearly are.
For someone who claims to have served their country against communist regimes in the past you appear curiously naive and uninformed on what communism is all about and why it is a proven failure. At this point, honestly, I have to question your stated history of service.
I would think someone with your stated history of service would (1) have a bit of a thicker skin than you do and (2) be better able to hold and defend a position than you.
You walked into that. BLM put their feeling first and you saw what happen to Minneapolis and other cities and you lecture me about putting my feelings first.
Same people who said āIt was mostly peacefulā. BTW crime spiked in Minneapolis. But this what voted for so they can suffer for all I care.
Iām not defending the officer. I never had a doubt in my mind that he was guilty of what he was charged of and the verdict in no way surprises me. Thatās not my point and you know it. If he had been found innocent, it was clear that the mob was going to do what they always do, which is riot, loot, destroy, and kill innocents. There is no justification for that.
āJusticeā in this country, however, is now inextricably linked with the fear of the reaction of the mob to any verdict which they donāt agree with. And thatās a problem. And itās only getting worse.
I responded with the reason why I find what Trump said about Kapernick to be worse than what Biden said about the trial, you got offended because you thought that was insulting to Trump.
Nobody in these forums actually cares what my positions on these things are, and nobody including myself, cares what your positions on these things are. I explained why I find your hyperbole insulting when you conflate my lack of indignation with the private sectorās treatment of highly paid employees with communism.
It has always been a failure because collectivism kills innovation and ambition, it has nothing to do with wealthy people being fired by their employers because of bad PR.
Because corporate censorship is part of the free market of a supplier choosing how to supply their own product to the market. You basically argued with yourself and confirmed the OP.
āBecause corporate censorship is part of the free marketā no its not and never was look back a few decades they never did this but now all of a sudden they started doing so, proving my point thats is has never been part of the free market and its only came about when people started crying about nothing to the higher ups
āsupplier choosing how to supply their own product to the market.ā so why are they going with mobs and not choosing how to supply it b/c each time some one gets cancelled its by the mob and the mob mass sends bs to the head and to save face they say ok
There were massive boycotts during the Civil Rights movement. Jewish communities boycotted German goods during WW2. India boycotted British goods to fight colonialism. Etc. Etc. Etc.
You didnāt āproveā anything, and i just shut your argument down without even having to use google.
And you proved that you have no idea what you are talking about.
āThere were massive boycotts during the Civil Rights movement. Jewish communities boycotted German goods during WW2. India boycotted British goods to fight colonialism. Etc. Etc. Etc.ā and was that for silencing a single person in a job for some thing they said nope try again
āYou didnāt āproveā anything, and i just shut your argument down without even having to use google.ā and you have yet to prove your claim and if you cant do facts then dont talk
āAnd you proved that you have no idea what you are talking about.ā nope I do you dont b/c you compared social movements to cancelling a single person for what they said
btw āyour argumentā was shut down before you even started facts are facts and the fact is if a group say YOU bad your employer will bow thats not a āsocial movementā nor āsupplier choosing how to supply their own product to the market.ā thats called getting cancelled
āThe Hollywood blacklist was the colloquial term for what was in actuality a broader entertainment industry blacklist put in effect in the mid-20th century in the United States during the early years of the Cold War. The blacklist involved the practice of denying employment to entertainment industry professionals believed to be or to have been Communistsā
so 1 this is still not for a single person you are conflating banning an ideology to going after a single person for some thing they said in the past that they moved on from
2 if u had spys going into your nation to destroy it from with in I would blacklist them too
so if u can give me an example like the vid I posted
Actually a list of individuals most of whom were banned for something they said in the past that they moved on from.
These were not foreign spies, they were individuals who had expressed an unpopular political belief. In many cases they hadnāt even done that but had āassociatedā with others who had. The only thing new about todays ācancel cultureā is the trendy name.
āActually a list of individuals most of whom were banned for something they said in the past that they moved on from.ā
nope wrong once more it was from the red scare maybe you should know history a bit it was for spys and ideology and that said ideology destroyed lives not for a person that said the N word and they have yet to move on to this day commies are here thats not moved on
āThese were not foreign spies, they were individuals who had expressed an unpopular political belief. In many cases they hadnāt even done that but had āassociatedā
with others who had. The only thing new about todays ācancel cultureā is the trendy name.ā
some not yes but others where in fact spys so your point is moot