why are arcane mages and fire mages being lumped seperately in this?
They are virtually the same thing - or are we gonna talk about how mages have 2 viable and strong PVE specs where as warriors have 1 dumpy one lol.
why are arcane mages and fire mages being lumped seperately in this?
They are virtually the same thing - or are we gonna talk about how mages have 2 viable and strong PVE specs where as warriors have 1 dumpy one lol.
So is frost, bm hunter. 2 of the bottom ones are warrior so below fury we have exactly 1 class that isnt being brought more on another spec, which is shamans.
Again stats dont lie, your conclusions do however.
Yet they changed several things about em recently so not quite.
It is pointless he is just arguing to argue, but the thing is any rational person knows what he is doing is just arguing, there is no point in even trying to argue with him. He is just farming forum posts cause all he does is forums and wow.
All warriors have a home living rent free in his head.
Good utilities too! lol ;D
I mean at the end of the day iâm still gonna play fury. Not like nerfs or buffs are gonna change that. Just want to be competitive if im gonna be taking BIS loot from other classes that are performing better than me. It feels weird ya know?
Also requiring bis setup to be competitive near the end of a phase is a little wonky. Ofc blinkâs ONE fury war in his raid is gonna do well becasue he probably gets fed all the loot. This anecdotal evidence isnât very representative of fury as a whole.
I just want to help in the damage ya know, i parse okay, but I would like all of these items invested in me producing more as it feels like the class is the only limiter right now. That and having a fully bis setup - which again feels weird getting to because other people can use the same loot to more effect it feels like. Until you are fully bis - is the investment worth it for normal guilds?
Maybe you canât readâŚ
On the top right thereâs a column that says parses⌠click that two times so it lists them in order of highest to lowestâŚ
There is 18 DPS specs that arenât specifically for PVP in fury ranks eight out of thatâŚ
Itâs like youâre literally lying about public information
Because they are different DPS specsâŚ
Raids bring 0 to 1 warriors. If there is a prot warrior they bring 0 dps warriors. Meanwhile theres like 3-5 paladins in every raid and paladins get a buff. Multiple druids, and ferals get a giga 20% buff. Lmao.
Aggrend plays ret, so his personal bias is likely coming into play here.
reiterating the same false bad faith point doesnt make it any more âtrueâ, it is the second least brought dps class on any given spec, least brought dps class by numbers of all available dps specs and currently with tank second least brought class to hunters where they are neck and neck.
Shh dont use logic on DrinkNBlink, he is a bit of dense one.
Citation needed
I donât get why youâre literally trying to lie about the data how is it the second last brought spec?
Itâs literally 8th out of the 18 viable DPS specsâŚ
Logic needed in anything you falsely claim
It is the second least brought dps spec that doesnt have a better spec alternative only to shamans at their two equally brought specs, rets and warrs being neck and neck. It is factually true and more relevant as wow players have never stuck to only one spec and never swapped, people swap to what is most viable nearly all the time.
but sure keep arguing that frost, bm, sublety, destro, MM, combat or feral are suffering when they have another option right above those warriors too. Thats why you are arguing in bad faith. Hell even Demo is a bring only 1 spec and the most brought spec is affli, another warlock option.
Man talk about being disingenuous
Look in the mirror drink, you embody being disingenuous. You a certified hater.
Youâre literally saying the data doesnât matter because the specs that itâs beating has better representation as a different specâŚ
Iâm pretty sure everybody brings at least one demo warlock but I guess we shouldnât anymore because they have affliction to playâŚ
Youâre literally deleting whole viable DPS specs in your argumentâŚ
Just keep lying my guy
Yes which matters, cause that is extremely important to why another worse of dps they have is below fury that is warriors best. Again all about integrity, a thing you should look up.
more disingenious arguments to the original argument about bad rep.
Where am i doing that, i am pointing out that as a dps spec or class warriors are on the bottom with their absolute best option and has no alternative. Not even an alternative tank or healing option either like several other of them also has.
The mirror drink, the mirror.
The fact that you just mention here that demo is brought âat least 1â, while being brought near equally to fury is the funny thing, cause you had an issue with another guy saying you eithe bring 1 or 0 fury further up.
There are more fury parses in the past two weeks than UNHOLY DK. This argument is incredibly stupid.
This dude is insane
now unholy + frost vs arms + fury, how is it looking ?
Feral.is S tier and fury has over 100,000 more parses than it.
You bring a demo cuz the buff is unique to that spec, sorry but pretty much everyone is bringing the spec that gives itâs raid 400 bonus spell damage and fury is beating them in representation
There are more fury warriors than there are unholy DKs, the best melee spec in the game.
EVERY raid has a Demo lock, and there are still more fury warriors. â0 to 1â fury warriors per raid is definitely not correct.
I honestly think it could be Baraddek. Not sure heâs unhinged enough, but wasnât he talking about using his alt account in that insane thread the other day?