Blizzard created its own server problems without Dungeon Finder

Automated changes like auto banning tower defenders in AV right? Wait…they have that now.

Those against rdf will never accept that because they know they’ll be left alone on a dead server if there’s no rdf there. They’re so emotionally stunted and unable to socialize that the only way they can get someone to talk to them is if they’re forced to to make a group

5 Likes

People engage in the world more with rdf. Instead of sitting in a city spamming chat to find a group they go out into the world to quest or farm, join the rdf queue, and wait for their dungeon to pop. After the dungeon they are teleported back to where they were in the world and continue questing or farming. To get out into the world to quest and farm while waiting for the dungeon is why many of us want rdf

If you weren’t out in the world when rdf was added that’s a you problem.

1 Like

WoW Classic is like the WNBA, it would fail and not be around if Retail was not there to keep it afloat. FF14 can at least stand on its own rather than needing a bigger game to prop it up.

Did you? Rdf came out in the end

Unless it’s a official poll, the people crying for it will skew it and the people who don’t care won’t fill it out.

Yes, and what patch are they doing isn’t it 3.3.5? RDF was out by then.

2 Likes

Classic was 1.12, did you see AQ on launch? No? Hmm

Tbc was 2.4.3, did you see isle of quel danas at launch? No? Hmm

So in what universe do you think IF they added RDF, that’s a big IF btw. That it would be in now.

So, if that’s your argument are we going to get balance patches throughout?

Did they do that for Classic or did we get 1.12 versions of classes?

1 Like

Why would we get balance patches? Are you intentionally being stupid rn?

terrible arguement. the inclusion of rdf is a huge departure in phase 1 gearing. after that point its fine as a catchup.

No, I’m saying they released the final versions of classes at the start. So, they can release RDF at the start.

So, you’re fine with having your final phase version of your warrior then?

So, you’re fine with the inclusion of RDF eventually?

1 Like

I’ll be playing paladin so im good with either. class balance also doesnt present a fundamental change in how systems are interacted with at end game. Try again.

It’s the final build of the game.
Mechanics, talents, scaling.

It’s not the final content phase.

RDF was not even in wotlk until ICC. The end of the xpac essentially.

People remember it being in there so much because ICC to cata was almost a year.

absolutely. im also fine with it for normals only immediately. or immediately with nerfs bringing it in line with manual grouping

Yeah remember before Classic launched when Blizz announced they were removing AQ from the game and never putting it in?

And before TBCC when they announced Quel’danas would never be in the game?

:man_facepalming:

The trolls don’t even try anymore.

how about implement it immediately for normals and phase 2/3 for heroics as a catchup! :smiley:

I agree, you really aren’t trying.

You can’t even make a logical arguement, you just devolve faster than a feminist being told no.

It’s always a matter of time before the anti-lfd trolls show their true colors.

:wave:

2 Likes

It’s a perfect analogy.