youre taking my statement out of context.
Im not saying people will not quit “as a result of it being not included”
Im saying people will not quit because it isnt planned for inclusion.
Two very different conversations.
Nope! theres one playerbase. IDGAF about anyone who may or may not come back and im glad the devs obviously dont either. If you havent been playing classic, you dont need to be considered as such.
Anyone else is a tangential benefit they may or may not reach.
These two camps are NOT the same
retail pfp and is just saying false statements here. Massive Copium or troll
Fair enough. But can you at least see how the lack of it might be an issue down the line? Would you be shocked if they ended up adding it in later?
1 Like
100% and no! i wouldnt be shocked. Pro rdf people have very real problems especially for leveling etc that rdf would certainly solve, but im concerned with the problems it would bring as well.
Again, that’s fair.
But I don’t know if it would be that much different than it is now. I started playing in early TBC back in 2007, and this community is nothing like what I saw back then. While you could argue that adding in RDF cause permanent damage to the community back in 2010, not having it now doesn’t seem to have really fixed anything if I’m being honest. Leaving it now now feels like trying to put a bandaid on the stub of a limb and expecting it to grow back.
What problems would it bring? I hear the doom and gloom, but I don’t see it. Explain please…
1 Like
It really has. the reason i play this game and not ffxiv is because i prefer to play games without it, like many people here do.
I have btw voiced my support for realm locked rdf. for rdf only for normals. for crossrealm LFG, AND for phase 3 rdf. ways that it could exist and impact those who dont want it less. Nerfed implementations as well.
GW2 would be the perfect game actually, if it had gear progression and the trinity of roles. (which is alot)
Classic wow would be perfect if it had #nomoreservers
Again, it’s your preference, but how does that tool effect you if you don’t use it?
2 Likes
Because pretty much everybody else would use it, and you need other players to do content with.
1 Like
If it was implemented with the buff, the extra badges AND all the added convenience yes it would make any other method of grouping non-viable.
I literally had a dude leave my group because it was “too far” for them and we couldn’t summon so another hour wasted as we speak.
No one cares about traveling, or talking.
Just RDF and all it’s glory.
Edit: It was Maul and he was like in UC or something.
2 Likes
In Retail WoW (and I’ve been playing since original Vanilla, btw), there is Dungeon Finder for everything but Mythics and N, H, M Raids. It works out fine. The only difference is you don’t have to spam the chat channel. There is minimal benefit to looking for a group on a chat channel. Most of the people still don’t talk much and there are still your hostile hardcores who need everything to go perfect or they throw fits like a 2 year old. THE ONLY difference, is that I don’t have to reach to them myself…it just happens.
So does this go both ways or just for the group of people arguing against RDF?
1 Like
I support a similar system, rdf for all normals and leveling dungeons.
Then we’re on the same page 
1 Like
100%! im glad and i hope blizzard and community organizers see us agreeing!
Rdf for normals is the most common sense solution with the easiest implementation tbh
1 Like
Nothing like free server transfers to abandon your community all in support of the “Nurture and Protect Social Experiences” pillar!
I think this makes 100% sense. Lets all the past 5 mans still be available to people. Lets you do 5 man quests in 5 mans as you level. But once you get to end game you got to buckle up and get into that (terrible) LFD tool (hopefully they make it a bit better with time) and make groups the old fashion way.
2 Likes
100% definitely agree!
1 Like