It should be that if an account is suspended it go to all your accounts on the bnet.
You arenât limited to one bnet
Na it can be picked up cause that form of multiboxing requires multiole pcs and a special broadcaster for a keyboard.
Right but 1 bnet can have 8 wow qccounts on it.
Ban a wow account meh make another one. Should be if 1 wow account gets banned then anymore you make are also banned.
Also im on mobile and im not fixing my typos
Not exactly, there is a lot of behaviors that are allowed but are frowned upon. Itâs more nuanced then a simple binary allowed/disallowed consideration. Multiboxing isnât something that is easy to address or enforce if you want to ban it without harming innocent individuals. So itâs allowed. But the language also suggests itâs only tentatively so and any crosses over the line is strictly forbidden.
Specific language is
âMultiboxing, or playing multiple World of Warcraft accounts at once, is not a violation of our End User License Agreement. Please note, however, that use of all software or hardware mechanisms used to mirror commands to multiple World of Warcraft accounts at the same time, or to automate or streamline multiboxing in any way may result in account penaltiesâ
Itâs not even stating itâs approved, itâs only statement is wellâŚyour not breaking the rules.
:o
first time i see something like this, as a frogger i feel like i dodge a bulled back then
Hard to do, unless they are streaming
Ip ban? Spoof ip
Hardware id ban? Spoof it
Ribbit
1 Like
You posted it yourself. Set a delay and bam.
While they can detect software via Warden memory scan, hardware is not really possible.
I can hook up a simple input repeater FPGA with a random sub 50ms delay on any 8 usb ports and say Iâm not automating anything, while not changing the final game experience. The burden of proof is on Blizzard.
Itâs just not a good idea to ban automated mirroring when you can do so manually with like 2 keyboards.
Either way, theyâll get to that eventually since the issue is not multiboxing, but mirrored inputs.
On-topic, while it looks like a win, itâs a L for Blizzard.
A rollback would suffice, a ban for simply playing the game like in this case is too much.
Thereâs no next level of explicit than saying âthis does not violate the rulesâ
wonder what kind of renown levels the exploiters had. it slows down a lot once around ~11
also wonder why they did it⌠i didnt notice anything juicy in the renown tracks.
Its more so the broadcaster. It has software built into it if i remember right.
Not sure of thier methods though.
Saying something does not violate rules=/= an action is approved. It just means it is not a bannable offense. Approval is something entirely different.
They were 20-25 from what Iâve read.
1 Like
Yea, it went well beyond doing it once by just playing the game
Wonât somebody think of the poor renowns 
Take a second to realize what this is quibbling over and how far gone you all are.
Holy cow thatâs worth more than a 4 day ban.
Also if they make another account do they still keep the renown due to warbands? If so, they can just get all the rewards again!
These straws are not there for you to grasp. Unless I get an attaboy and a slap on the back it isnt approved, I guess.
Yep. Itâs a publicity stunt to say, âHey look! We did something!â
No you didnât, Blizz.
1 Like