stop your logic and having me agree. it’s against my rules of engagement.
Good thing its already fair.
- Not relevant here.
- The system is fair. Stop whatever is getting you kicked so much that it’s kept you up gor 3 days
If I knew that there would be more GMs reviewing reports and extremely harsh punishments for trying to circumvent a Deserter Debuffs, I would agree to remove the debuff from kicks.
As it stands, that’s not happening. All I really hope for are extra measures to deter lazy/oblivious “yes” voting, like a character/word limit to vote “yes” on kicks.
Even if that were true, there’s always room for improvement.
People are just as likely to lazily vote no.
Blizz has no intention of improving it
I wouldn’t be too sure about that.
Community feedback has led to improvements before. I’d rather hope they’ll surprise us with some improvements.
I would
Updated 3 weeks ago.
They have. It’s just requires more community noise to get the change.
I understand that a developer made a comment 3 weeks ago, but systems and policies can always evolve based on player feedback and changing circumstances.
What if I never get kicked, can I have a different reward?
They don’t care. They wiped their hands of it.
Give feedback that is possible without causing more problem. You didn’t reply to my post explaining how both of your “solutions” are worst than status quo.
I respectfully disagree. I believe that continued feedback and discussion can lead to positive changes over time.
Thanks for sharing your perspective.
If they have to continue to deal with 10 threads a week on this issue. They might take another look at it.
Considering most “yes” prompts people see involve things like are you sure you want to equip this item, it will become soulbind or are you sure you want to disenchant this item, I don’t think no is as common as yes.
If you go too long without getting kicked, the Arbiter will randomly kick someone for you. This will not be limited to queued content.
dont change this. i enjoy kicking out people who are holding my group back.