LOL yeah, there you go. We’ve explained this before too. And of course it did.
The map could have been moved because that’s where the dart landed on the map. It doesn’t matter. The effect was the same. Whether or not that effect was intended makes no difference.
Do you realize how crazy it is to keep saying, Moving the cave couldn’t have made a difference because it was moved for a different reason.
See??
Troll, troll, troll.
Map imbalances aren’t made up. Keep trolling.
This.
And this.
I mean it’s a fact alliance look at what horde have, scream unbalanced and completely ignore their own map advantages…
You keep alluding to these things as if there is some hidden strategy that would actually work.
You’re just as bad, and trollish, as Misadventure. Either present these advantages, in detail, and explain how they can be used, in detail, to actually achieve at least a 50% chance of success, or go away.
These drive-by, vague, oh-the-secrets-I-could-tell, nonsense comments are just smug douchebaggery.
You got me there.
It’s not a big secret.
Try looking up the 15 years of AV strategies and countered to strategies.
Just a friendly reminder to report Redheadchild and Misadventure posts for trolling.
Having a different opinion based on historic facts is trolling now.
Got it.
Trolling. Got it.
I posted a link to a YouTube video that shows it in one of these AV threads.
The thing that is required to make the strategy work is people actually doing the strategy.
It looks like they are the same person. I’ve ignored one single person on the forums, Misadventure. When I attempted to do the same with Redheadchild and clicked to view his profile, it shows ‘ignored’ even though I can see clearly see his post still.
They might want to fix that. If I’m ignoring someone, I mean to ignore the person, not the character.
EDIT: I take it back. That same thing apparently shows up for everyone once you ignore anyone. My bad, I apologize.
Not the same person, if you look at the instance limit discussion you can clearly see that we disagree on it.
Really? How odd, as Redhead and I argue with each other about different subjects. But I guess we could be the same person, just a split personality.
What do you think, Red?
I tHiNk yOu mIgHt bE oN To sOmEtHiNg, mIsAdVeNtUrE, YoU lOoK pArTiCuLaRlY bUfF tOdAy, i mUsT sAy!
I think they are trying to use the same argument you used for the instance limit cap of alt army but hay that’s their view on it. Clearly it can’t be wrong because it’s how they feel about it am I right? And feelings are clearly more important than facts these days.
Perhaps, but we have been on these forums for quite a while and are not a slew of 0 post puppets.
Feels are apparently facts now, and historical evidence means nothing.
Yep, my bad. Sorry about that.
Oh well… I’ll go scroll through all your posts to find the outsourced reliance on a supposed YouTube video…
/facepalm
Since you seem to be unable to look any facts up yourself.
‘https://youtu.be/jgDuSyY7MrY’
Notice how even the video makes states that the reason for losing is your own team not knowing what to do (or just not doing it) and communication.
So that vid esentially boils down to cap IBGY or you lose and makes no comment on the fact that Horde can defend it and mass reinforce that GY.
He even says that if you lose the IBGY the game is a loss and not worth staying in.
so thanks for proving us correct and you incorrect.
he gets a high “winrate” by only staying in games that alliance have already capped IBGY or are able to cap on the initial push.
If that’s all you got from the video you only saw what you wanted to see. But ok.