Again, that’s simply incorrect.
And the opposite has been true. What’s your point.
That’s the entire point. You stated that one spec is designed specifically for one area of content, the other spec, the other. History has repeatedly proven both false.
With his passion for antiquated balancing concepts I’m kinda curious when he’s gonna start arguing for the hybrid tax.
Was actually going to make a comparison if (when) this continues to that.
If you are referring to yourself I will agree with you. Minus legion which did favor fury and TBC with the African turtle cleave arms has been the dominant spec for the high end. Regardless of your claims of what is objective truth or not the facts are there for you and anyone else. And if you do not even know the actual point I gave you then you are truly a lost cause.
Well, and 8.0, and 8.1.
If they specifically design and tune the specs to be stronger in one area and weaker in the other, why has it repeatedly been the case for the opposite to hold true.
Agreeing with someone like Derez? Seems like you insist on trolling me again? Or should I snippet your statements to alter its meaning like you do me?
That is a very obtuse way of making a point. Very bizarre. Please reframe the statement to where it can be understood. If you want to know when the balance was actually at its best WOD can objectively or even subjectively be viewed as having the most diverse team of specs and classes.
Talking about you not to you. Interpret it or respond however you want, you’re not the audience and I don’t particularly care.
Sorry to steal your thunder 
Yeah. Flaming other posters in this forum is possibly a good way to get yourself a temp ban. Please reframe from talking about me if you are going to respond. I am not going to take being pushed around this time lightly. Consider this your only warning please and keep things civil.
I’m positively shaking 
I’ll talk about whatever I want with Derez, assuming he remains interested. My posts always have been and always will be within the CoC. The only warning I care about is the one blizz gives us all when we agree to them.
So both specs should be even in the player vs player format? It actually makes better sense than trying to balance two dps specs around both performing well in pvp and pve. Ever know of a time that pvp strength of a spec was boosted without it being affected on the pve aspect of the game?
There was actually a post on the EU warrior forum that seemed interesting about tying rage and mastery to a bonus of strength and a bonus to mortal strike and colossus smash. I think that might be an interesting way to rework arms since I am not fond of its mastery.
I don’t think it’s too farfetched to aim for balance of both specs in multiple aspects of the game.
Has blizzard even once been able to accomplish that?
I don’t like fact that execute no longer applies bleeds, and spell reflect nerf also hurts. However the new mastery change might be good, I’ve had some real bursts seeing people going from 100% to 30% in 2-3 seconds after hit. I guess will just wait and see how glad warriors will work it out.
Aren’t you quitting wow? You’ve said multiple times that you’re quitting and yet here you are.
I am not sure what are you talking about.
You posted this in the WPvP forums and yet here you are, still spewing garbage.
People lies on the internet? how dare.
Oh I’m not actually surprised you lied, just disappointed you’re still here.
Hamstring is the worst melee slow in the game. It costs a bunch of resources has limited range, only slows for 50% and its on GCD.