Because a certain person who everybody on GD knows is still spamming his weird lgbt threads and despite each post being reported nothing seems to happen.
So are there forum mods or are there not?
Yes, there are forum mods. Something to keep in mind however, is that just because a thread gets flagged, doesnât mean itâs in violation of any rules. It only means that several people flagged it.
The mods follow rules for when they edit a post, remove a post, delete a thread or take further actions on players who break the rules.
We as players also have tools at our disposal. You can put the other player on ignore and you can also mute any threads they make that you donât want to partake in.
8 Likes
So is trolling against, or not against the rules?
If yes, then clearly the mods are useless.
If no, then then a lot of people get suspended for no reason, meaning the mods are worse then useless.
6 Likes
You can find the Forum Code of Conduct here:
Iâm not going to get into any sort of debate about whether a thread you feel is trolling would or would not violate the rules.
As for the mods, keep in mind that they moderate ALL the forums, not just WoW. So the one thing I will say is that they could certainly use more mods to handle the flags.
7 Likes
So youâve come to this post to give literally no relevant input.
Thanks.
4 Likes
Youâre asking about the forum rules and I provided a direct link to them.
Youâre welcome.
Iâd recommend against trolling this particular forum though. Itâs heavily moderated by the Support Forum Agents (not the mod-squad).
10 Likes
You got quite relevant input. You got accurate information on forum moderation.
What you are seeking is information on a specific poster and their alts. Blizzard is not going to discuss that.
What I can say, is that Mods see each report as individual and donât look the pattern of behavior. Hence, concern trolling and walking grey lines can go on for a long time.
It is also the case, that on their own, each thread is technically not a rules violation, besides possibly spam. That they are disruptive, intentional, and a problem is true. But that their threads are not technically a violation on their own, is also true.
9 Likes
I made a post about such behavior over in General Discussion, suggesting that there be an option to report people suspected of it. If specific investigations into this could be prompted, it would solve this flaw:
No, it was a rhetorical question we both knew the answer to, and you only linked to avoid the point of the question.
1 Like
If all youâre looking for folks to agree with you, then that isnât what this forum is for. You got info on the forum mods and how they work. What you believe is or isnât against the rules isnât part of the topic. Any personal believe on a given person/poster isnât relevant to this forum or the overall topic.
11 Likes
No.
Information for the wrong question.
It is if thatâs the topic, and can be shown objectively to be true.
So what is your non-ritorical question then?
So far, you asked if there were mods, yes there are, and if trolling is avainst the rules, which you can see in the rules under the trolling section. But that question was allegedly rhetorical.
So what hasnât been answered yet?
11 Likes
Yes, there are and they review the various reports they get in accordance to our policies. As others mentioned though, just because a thread is reported doesnât mean it is considered to be against policy.
These forums are here for players to discuss aspects of the game with each other and to provide suggestions and feedback on what they would like to see. That may include topics that have been discussed before, or that some disagree with or feel shouldnât be in game. The suggestions are still valid, even if others believe that the person posting them isnât being genuine.
Trolling is, however, a lot of what people consider trolling, isnât. As I mentioned above, the threads arenât necessarily considered trolling just because itâs a subject that has been discussed before, or you feel the person is not being genuine in their request.
What is more often considered trolling are the comments folks post in the thread, such as constantly accusing someone of posting with their alts, or accusing them of trolling/spamming and numerous other, often disparaging, comments.
I would clarify, their alleged alts. As I have noted previously in similar threads, the accusations Iâve seen of folks posting on alts are often, though not in every case, wrong.
For instance, letâs speak to those generally considered the âTâsâ. Often they all rolled into one, but which very much are not the same person.
Yes, we have a number of similar names, which feels purposeful, but that doesnât make them the same person or otherwise associated with one another. That isnât to say that one person hasnât posted on multiple accounts over time. I know of one that has adopted a new posting character over time, as previous accounts were no longer viable to post. Nothing nefarious with that.
I can sort of agree here. I will say though, moderators do see patterns and can recognize names that theyâve seen before. Can it be missed in the grand scheme of things? Yes, but they arenât oblivious to some troublesome folks and do deal with them as they are verified. That is the trick, verification. A lot of times the suspicions and accusations Iâve seen of the person being the same arenât at all verified. There just isnât evidence that they are, and to be clear, it is more than just looking at an IP to see if it is the same.
Assuming we are just talking about the threads themselves and not the alleged posting on alts to create a narrative Iâd say it is opinion. The subject matter often controversial and can be divisive for some, but I would argue that it not necessarily intentional or a problem.
Could it be intentional? Yes, but in most cases the suggestion is still very much valid, which is what the moderators are looking at. With no other indicators, other than some folks saying âwe donât want you to post thisâ, it should otherwise be allowed.
The issue isnât exactly looking into sock-puppeting, our moderators do that all the time. Itâs that our moderation team would be unable to communicate to the reporting person that their accusation proved to be false, which has been the case in many of these instances. That nothing happens as the result of a report isnât usually seen as the accusation was incorrect, but that the moderators arenât doing anything about it.
The most I can say, Idontknowhow, is that weâre very much aware of the current limitations on the forums and how easy it is for some to use alternate characters to both report and support posts and that it is being worked on.
20 Likes
I was unaware that moderators did investigate this. The specific problem I raised in my own thread is that given how disruptive sockpuppeting is in its own right, there should be a flag option for it.
I also did not know this.
Understood. Thank you for the communication.
4 Likes
The problem is that clearly the intent is harmful, and the bad-faith spamming is doing harm to actual people. By keeping these issues constantly on the front page of the forums disingenuously, almost in a parody of real opinions that real people might hold pushed out to the bleeding edge of reasonability, theyâre giving people a platform to voice awful, harmful opinions that donât quite violate the forumâs rules, but instead just create a general dogpiling aura of non-acceptance and anger.
Having multiple threads up at all times about the same subjects, in a way that no actual person could actually feel like needs to be discussed in infinite variations all in new threads, lets people who feel like âthe lifestyles of other people are being forced on meâ feel justified. Is that a nonsense opinion? Yes. Should those be the people who get account actions? Also yes. But thereâs also apparently nothing not-allowed about being baited into saying âI donât like this and I wish you people would go away, why do you want to ruin the game that I playâ as long as they donât break out slurs and attacks.
These threads are serving up a platform for debate on issues that shouldnât be up for debate on a platter, with a sprig of parsley garnish, thatâs literally the point of them, and apparently somehow everyoneâs hands are tied?
As long as thatâs the official standpoint of the moderator team, the trolling will go on. With protection, even. Setting out a template for exactly what people can get away with if they want to be disruptive and turn the front page of the General forums into a constant discordant brawl, and weâve already seen other people taking up the same style and tone over time.
You guys make the rules. If people are being consistently disruptive, rules-lawyering their way into making the forums a more hateful and less accepting place by baiting other people into doing their dirty work and giving them a bad-faith exaggerated target dummy to rail against, they donât have to be swearing and attacking and using slurs themselves to be seen to the door.
6 Likes
Unless they clearly state âIâm making those threads to stir the potâ then applying what you think someone else is doing doesnât magically make them doing what you think theyâre doing. No amount of trying to bend or twist what was said to favor what outcome you want.
If you think folks are voicing anything harmful or the like on the forumsâŚthen report the post. The mods whom take reports will look over them and action anyone that they deem are breaking the rules.
Report the threads as spam. If someone or a group of some people are making threads about the same thing in a short time frame, report them for such. And no, youâre applying something that isnât there asâŚtheyâre threads, not people yelling in the streets.
Report the treads. The forums canât reasonably stop someone from make a given thread about something, nor can the mods action someone before it happens.
To be blunt, the forums isnât going to be for folks with only a given view point that goes with a given personâs mindset. Not everyone going to agree with everyone else and anyone can disagree with someone that wonât magically be trolling.
No, they enforce the rules. And theyâre not going to make rules that cater to a given group. The folks on top made it a general and less âDoing X will get Y and doing A will have B actionsâ. If you think the rules should be changed, I believe thatâs better suited for the general forum or the website forum.
4 Likes
They are usually flagged into oblivion as soon as they appear, and then get restored with flag protection. And the merry-go-round goes round.
The pattern of behavior is clear, and so is the intent from the way that the posters react, or donât react, and then go on to make a new thread on barely a different subject along the same lines the next day to stir the pot again.
Normally Iâd say yes, Iâm no mind reader, no one can really know what lead someone to say this here, now. But any regular to GD can tell you exactly what this group of trolls is doing, and why. Itâs basic pattern recognition that for whatever reason the moderator team isnât applying, and that inaction is allowing behavior to thrive that is creating a real, hostile environment for some people.
6 Likes
Your overall argument is beautifully worded and well phrased.
4 Likes
I deeply appreciate the insight into the current forum policy, Vrakthris. That being said, I do feel like current policy might be failing to recognize the harm of disingenuous posts. I suppose that people being mistaken for alts of other people is one consequence of that. It occurs to me that other forum users may be attributing patterns of behavior to alt-hopping that could just as easily be chalked up to that general feeling of inorganic behavior. Two people pretending to be invested in a topic will likely adopt similar behaviors in an attempt to fit the same mold.
I sort of get how it could be hard to make that call. As a simple player, itâs easy to look at things other users say and go âWhat would their motive be for phrasing this thread in such a provocative way?â and go with whatever conclusion the preponderance of evidence draws, but I assume the moderators probably abide by stricter standards.
And at what point does one draw a distinction between being socially awkward and intentionally phrasing things in the worst ways to provoke an argument? Itâs easy for me to understand why the mods exercise restraint.
I just hope that the one user Iâve observed being exceptionally aggressive about posting these very inorganic feeling threads that feel like theyâre designed to bait out vile responses eventually gets caught in the net. âŚOr bored, I guess.
2 Likes
Feedback belongs in General Discussion. Vrakthris and the other SFAs in Customer Support donât make policy and are not liaisons with those who do.
2 Likes