I haven’t finished all of it yet but so far I have not seen evidence merely allegations. When I get to any proof then I may change my mind.
Which was what this was all about. The original article provided nothing of substance. To be judge jury and executioner based on that alone is insanity. I was providing an explanation that is plausible and wouldn’t make Blizz out to be some EVIL corporation.
Truth be told I hope Blizz gets nailed on it even if they are innocent for endorsing all this stuff in the first place.
yup…all over hollywood and DC the last few years.
Nail the ones who cant cover it up well enough, make it a spectacle to make it APPEAR that we’re doing something.
and it all keeps right on going on.
They just find better ways to scare the women into shutting up.
I wonder whats all going on here. This line is confusing. “including having nude photos passed around at a company holiday party” - how is your employer having nudes of you?
Again, that’s the standard for criminal cases. This is a civil case, where the prosecution only needs to show moderate evidence before the burden of proof shifts to the defense. They’ve done that. Activision-Blizzard is not being deprived of due process here.
That actually doesn’t matter. If they had any kind of consent relationship it’s ok. The problem is that he can’t show that kind of private pictures around without consent.
lmao.
Liars are liars. Liars lie.
When one is a liar in one area of their life, they pretty much are liars in ALL aspects of life.
you know why cops do so many ‘pointless’ traffic stops?
Because REAL criminals break all sorts of little laws…speeding and slow rolling thru stop signs. Because they have NO regard for the law, any law.
Cops catch tons of criminals during traffic stops…and get shot a lot in the process.
Bad behavior is habitual.
The company has impressed me that they dont care about anything but the almighty $$$.
I dont doubt for a second if a president can commit acts of indecency that a company who lies to their paying customers has plenty of employees who break harassment laws, etc.
Who isn’t following that? Because, not being a judge or on a jury, I am not required to presume innocence. The courts have to follow it, and media needs to at least give it lip service, but unless someone here is a judge or gets a jury summons, I don’t think anyone who needs to follow it is being remiss in their duties.
I’m just a simple tailor.
Probably only true because around half of US adults are female.
These kinds of things rarely have physical evidence.
Yeah, that sounds like something the forum-goers are going to do.
How often have these kinds of allegations, when it’s more than just one person making a tweet, turned out to be NOT true?
Nope a large manufacturing company with multiple plants. And please tell me how I’m dumb. Ignorant of a specific law perhaps but thats not a factor on ones intelligence.
And as per the letter of the law a supply closet fulfills the need
Employers are also required to provide a place, other than a bathroom, that is shielded from view and free from intrusion from coworkers and the public, which may be used by an employee to express breast milk.
Which in the case of my company if it ever came up there are several places that would work including but not limited to a supply closet, the maintenance storage shed, or one of the offices up stairs with a sign saying do not disturb.
With that being the case I again ask why devoting a room specifically for breast feeding is necessary. They could maintain this room is used for it but if we need to hold a meeting and its in progress please do it here or here instead. Doesn’t sound like an issue to me unless someone wants to make it into one.
They can do that but it would verify they are guilty in the public eyes and if they win it in court then they can clear it but the wrong would still not be met and the culture will still go on regardless. catch 22.