They expanded how evil he was. There was no gray in his actions.
1 Like
There was. In same vein that Sargeras wasn’t just destroying world for no reason. Arthas was twisted and yet he still kept certain parts of himself particularly his desire for order and justice(his twisted version of course). Hence why he considered undead the preferable state.
That’s not morally grey dude. That’s just flat out evil. But I see you’re still on this cringe inducing love fest for Arthas.
3 Likes
They are just that, your opinions. Which are not based at all on what the story presented. They are based entirely on your own personal feelings.
Exaggerating still makes you look really petty and mean.
2 Likes
No, its the twisted sort of morally grey people defend Sylvanas for while blaming Arthas. In both cases there is a sliver of something you might even see commendable on both actions but really both were evil.
Again this “arrows in her quivers” are as much a part of lore as anything.
Oh so it’s still about Arthas… not Calia at all. You just want to stick it to the Forsaken fans because Arthas got poofed away, like a slate fart.
More than he deserves, really.
seems like you just want to take Lordaeron back for your own personal reasons… not unlike what you project on Sylvanas.
4 Likes
Dude literally cut his heart out. Blizz has been beating you and the other neck beard Arthas fans for YEARS now that the dude, was, is and died a evil human being. It’s entirely you’re fault you can’t come to grips with that 
4 Likes
Sylvanas was going to kill her sister and nephews because she wanted some familial companion in the Undercity.
And Blizzard has told us no one is evil enough to deserve the Maw and had we gotten to him sooner he like every other soul in Maw would deserve a second change with Pelagos giving them said chance.
BLIZZARD says he was, is and died a EVIL human being. Your opinion does not matter nor does Pelagos for that matter.
2 Likes
He died evil but literally Blizzard told us ANYONE is deserving of redemption. That is the entire story of Shadowlands. That had we gotten to him sooner he might have gotten the same treatment as anyone else.
That’s literally the OPINION of one character in the entire expansion. NOBODY but Pelagos expresses such an opinion.
Come to grips, and just accept the cannon facts already.
4 Likes
That is Blizzard giving us their moral stance ingame.
The canon fact is Arthas died evil, but everyone regardless of how evil they are can be redeemed in Warcraft. He was just unluckly we didnt get to him sooner.
Revendreth ultimately gets to decide who deserves the Maw and who doesn’t. That’s literally their entire purpose. The opinions of Pelagos, doesn’t mean it’s set in stone.
1 Like
There is nothing stating Revendreth will have the ability to chuck anyone they want to the Maw. Seems like Pelagos was quite clear no one was ever going to the Maw again.
He just simply stated his OPINION that everyone deserves a CHANCE at redemption. He did NOT say the Maw was going to stop serving it’s purpose, which is to house the souls of those considered irredeemable.
1 Like
Sylvanas is supposeto save ALL souls from the Maw. Not just those we think are redeemable.
He literally tells her to save those UNJUSTLY sent to the Maw. He never once says the Maw is going away or is going to stop serving it’s purpose.
1 Like
Tyrande Whisperwind says: Every Soul lost in its depths, betrayed or condemned.…
Tyrande Whisperwind says: you shall find and send forth to the Arbiter
Tyrande Whisperwind says: to be judged with the compassion all souls deserve.
Tyrande Whisperwind says: You will toil there, under Dori’thur’s watchful eye,
Tyrande Whisperwind says: scouring every darkened reach,
Tyrande Whisperwind says: until the final soul is free, and you are all that remains.
Tyrande is not Pelagos……
2 Likes
Then correction, Pelagos AND Tyrande have now effectively ordered Sylvanas to clear out the Maw.