Then they can make respecs 10g which avoids the problems that come with duel spec while fixing the main gripe people have with not having it. Not to mention it’s a way more effective gold sink since people will actually consider respecs worth it.
3 Likes
1 Like
how about 50g? 
1 Like
How about hell no. 50g respecs bring nothing of value to the game. They are bringing in the chronoboon and overhauling the honor system, yet reducing the respec cost (making zero system changes) is a bridge too far for you?
10g is just common sense.
2 Likes
Lol leave the game alone!!! Stop changing it!!
5 Likes
I’d be fine with dual spec, but to avoid major changes in gameplay it should be something you can only make use of in a capital city (can’t change specs in the open world only in a capital)
Or
It shouldn’t be added at all and instead replaced with the same system that came with the game but at a reduced cost.
3 Likes
This is so funny that you think that, the only thing that respec gold sink creates is more RMT. You know nothing.
IF people are so against dual spec even when proven it’s a good change, then just cap the respect costs at 1 gold?
5 Likes
As long as it includes saving an additional set of bars/talents some how without an addon then great. The addon is annoying and buggy.
1 Like
Yes, why exacerbate these problems? You are proving slippery slopes really do exist.
1 Like
don’t make things cost too much cuz then we’ll just buy gold!!!
cool threat don’t care tho
Not threat, just literally what happens on every classic wow server because blizzard has little to no moderation of RMT. Look at turtlewow, respec cost is capped at 5g, doesn’t seem like their market has these issues, wonder why.
1 Like
turtlewow is garbage
1 Like
Wasn’t really the point of my post, but ok.
1 Like
Turtle wow does a lot of things very well.
5g cap would be a fantastic compromise.
No major gameplay change by being able to swap anywhere at anytime. And no one goes broke trying to experience content.
best i can do is 50g
Even if they did 50, it’d be better than dropping 100g every week.
I think it should be lower, but cheaper is cheaper.
Unlikely set in stone as they are keeping: rank reform, chronoboon, and graphics. Meaning we might see a dual spec as that allows for people to have more flexibility or allow people to have a pvp and pve spec. What you just linked is legalize for ‘we are keeping some of the changes made over the course of vanilla and generally want to recreate the vanilla/tbc experience’.
It’s so strange that some kid who doesnt even raid is so against a change that wont affect them
1 Like
What does raiding or not raiding have anything to do with adding dual spec to Classic Vanilla?
Also, adding dual spec would have a massive effect on every single player who players Classic Vanilla.
If the problem is respec costs being too expensive, if that’s even a problem, dual spec is way overkill in trying to fix that problem.