Kudos to you. Anybody else would be embarrassed or ashamed to admit not being able to read above a third grade level. But you wear it with pride.
1 Like
âMuh gambling addiction! How dare you want items to be rare and based on chance rather than fulfilling quotas or checking boxes!â
All you have is your opinion on how you things should and shouldnât be and yet you keep trying to disguise your opinion as some sort of logical argument based on facts or evidence. It isnât. You just donât like RNG. Boohooo. Too bad. Blizzard isnât going to change it because you keep whining about it in the forums. RNG is here to stay. Deal with it
1 Like
Stop using these petulant buzzwords and using them incorrectly. I didnât gaslight or lie about anything. Youâre just angry and want to toss around terms that make people you donât like, look bad. The only one lying is you. Whether or not itâs intentional or just incompetence, is a different story.
No, itâs because I can tell that youâre far beneath my efforts and that youâre clearly an antagonistic chronically online person who thinks theyâre good at arguing when theyâre not. Youâre like a child learning how to walk, and upon discovering this newfound skill, you see an adult, sitting down, giving you a false sense of superiority based on lack of understanding.
90% of your posts are you arguing with people and then nitpicking their responses and then trying to âdebateâ whether their responses are valid or not according to some invisible rulebook that only you have access to. Itâs no wonder why everyone seems to have a problem with you. How about you take some advice and go do something else besides antagonizing people on a fantasy game appreciation forum.
INB4 you try to pretend how I started it and try to convince yourself that youâre actually the good guy and everyone else is the problem.
1 Like
Yeah, iâm pretty sure him calling people âmutantsâ in the same breath with sir/maham that falls under this⌠
Insultingly refer to any aspect of sexual/romantic orientation or gender identity/expression (male, female, trans-gender, bi-gender, pangender, genderfluid, agender or any non-binary identity not listed) pertaining to themselves or other players
âŚOh look, Thorgoreguy responded to me atfer he said he wasnât going to respond to me anymore. 
Letâs see what heâs on about this time.
Youâre welcome to deny reality, but itâs still subjective on what youâve said.
Time and Distance are objective measures.
Color and Sound are only objective if were talking digitally, but otherwise, itâs just an an experience that is different from human to human, like smell and taste. I canât taste you taste, nor see the same colors you possibly see. The same goes to everybody else.
Nothing in your philosophical rambling about âperceptionâ has any objectivity to it that can actually be measured. All you really said âwell i find it funâ or âi like itâ.
Speaking of philosophical rambling, iâm going to skip this lecture, because itâs completely irrelevant to the argument here.
Mate, you can deny it, but youâve positioned it as such, given how youâre using your positivity as a tactic here as you think itâs substantive reasoning alone.
So why youâre still trying to push it as a point by following it up with this then?
You first, because youâre the one acting like itâs the court.
Itâs not substantive nor thereâs any logical reasoning behind this. So itâs not really a point.
Oversimplifcation from you.
I want it minimized because it would be much better for the game to have more consistent rewards you work for. In the same vein as VP and JP back in Wrath/Cata. Not âi want to do this in the same hourâ, more of âi want to spend a consistent amount of time getting this, even if it takes weeks to get itâ. You did say persistence and endurance is a skill, and this is persistence/endurance. It just rewards that persistence/endurance much more consistently. That being, enduring grinding enough of the currency to buy what you need.
Youâre the only one here who is treating it like that, iâm just simply having a casual debate with you.
Thereâs a difference between people getting happy that a rare item drops, and you getting so happy that you want more RNG over putting in effort because their addicted to it at the cost of other peopleâs enjoyment. Youâre the latter one here.
The way you talk down skill, is telling that you donât want to put in the effort.
Especially since the same can be said to RNG.
An opinion that actually betters the game for a majority of people involved.
You say that because your philosophical lectures of âOh real life has luck!..â isnât logical given the fact that really doesnât apply to video games that much. Video games are an interactive medium after all.
I see you donât have any actual logic or facts here, and just throwing out this âItâs not going anywhereâ bit. I mean should people complaining about boosters back in 2019 with classic, ought to deal with it because âitâs here to stayâ? Because blizzard has been slowly changing aspects of the game to combat that.
Point being, these sorts of statements always age badly. Because Blizzard listens to feedback and change if the need arises. This game is constantly changing both in and out of game. Ya know, the real life you keep on talking about, itâs constantly changing and sometimes people change it when the need arises, so it makes sense that Blizzard does the same.
Youâre only calling them buzzwords because you dislike what iâm saying but have nothing to refute other then âwell-- i-i-i-i I DIDNâT LIE⌠or GASLIGHT!!â⌠while still doing those things, as well pulling a frivolous âno uâ argument, because thatâs essentially nearly your comments now. Like iâm legit impressed you managed to out do Hercules in like fewer words.
Didnât you say you were not going to respond to me any further? What changed your mind mate? Honestly, these 3 comments (which you couldâve easily combined them into one) is pretty bitter sounding coming from you⌠
Oh looky looky, a Paragraph of ad-homs. Skip. 
You actually scoured though 13,286 (as the time of writing) posts of mine, or are you just pulling it out of thin air?
If youâre implying your way of debating is what you consider the proper way, then iâm going to stick with my way, because itâs working out much better for me honestly, and itâs getting me pretty civil and honest replies from normal people. 
Not my problemo that your way of debating is awful and you want to project that on to me. 
Why you keep thinking iâm like policing you or something? Iâm simply having a debate, and yet over here, youâre thinking itâs more then just that. "Oh my god, you think itâs a COURT!!! You think youâre the judge! you have an invisable rulebook!! 
"
The people in your head donât count buddy.
Plus, Lahill, Thailla and a few other forum members i come across are pretty chill with me. Even if i disagree with them vehemently to a point where we get into a proverbial spitshow, we just get over it, or come to a mutual understanding somehow, because carrying a grudge here is kind of pointless. I know that because i actually did get into a spit match with Thailla⌠twice. And i assume she has the same thoughts here. Whatâs done is done, we move on, time heals wounds, etc etc.
And to the people who are choosing or still choosing to hold a grudge over me because they lost an argument or canât be civil with me? Their loss really.
You know whatâs the funny part? Those people who hold a grudge against me, are often the people who has the same arguments as yours, including your ânobody likes youâ argument that you two (hercules), love to rag me on for, as if youâre the representative of everybody on the face of the planet and can speak for everybody.
Nice job diminishing your own philosophical âreal lifeâ ramblings by reminding me that itâs a fantasy game.
Also, says the person who does nothing but use their ânobody likes youâ argument thatâs only built to antagonize people.
I see youâre also taking lessons from QuantiumTVâs school of projection.
This is called projection. Pot, meet Kettle.
1 Like
If youâre implying I said that, then your reading comprehension is really REALLY bad.
Lol. No. Theyâre not. Time doesnât even exist without us to perceive it. Glad to know you failed physics class.
Yeah. Thatâs the point. Because itâs a videogame. Iâm not the one trying to act like they have facts on their side when arguing about opinion on a VIDEOGAME
No, I didnât. You just have something in your brain that makes you think everything everyone says is an argument that you need to dismantle and then embarrass yourself trying to do so
Because opinions are valid reasons when talking about opinions. What are you even trying to say?
LMAO. No Iâm not even close to doing that. You however clearly are.
Case in point
*proceeds to state his opinion
This is some hilarious cope coming from the most antagonistic, contrarian poster on the forums.
I disagree, low drop rates are amazing, second only to FOMO items that actually disappear forever. Some of us enjoy having things almost no one else can or will ever get despite how much some people here donât like it. I LOVE having rare items and itâs one of the main reasons I still play this game.
1 Like
Here, here. I agree.
1 Like
But getting rid of super low drop rates would quickly put my 11 alts that have been sitting at the Sha of Anger for the last 10 years out of the job.
1 Like
You literally have.
Actually they are, because without them, society wouldnât function. We wouldnât have things like Video games, or Internet, or work schedules, or GPS, and so on.
Speaking of time, you had like 2 days to actually think out a response, and this is what iâm greeted with? 
Nice denial there mate. Considering itâs pretty convenient that now trying to do this âOh itâs just a video game, so it doesnât matterâ as a legit tactic to try to refute only me, when you donât realize that applies to you too. If itâs just a video game, why youâre responding to me seriously at then?
Critical thinking is not your strongsuit today, is it?
Saying âwell i have funâ isnât a substantive argument because fun is subjective. It canât be measured in any reliable way. since everybody has a different idea of what fun is. Which is why itâs not used as a serious argument, because fun can derive from anywhere.
That fact youâre giving me this ad-hom here with this âembarrass yourselfâ (which is super ironic given youâre telling me time and distances arenât objective measures), i mean youâre just proving what iâve said there. You are positioning it as such. You havenât exactly made an actual rebuttal to this.
Not inherently. You have to give valid reasons that go beyond just opinions instead of just saying âwell i like itâ, to make it valid reason.
Saying âI like itâ isnât âThis is goodâ. And Vice versa.
Nice denial mate. Itâs like youâre copying Herculeâs dumb arguments to a tee here.
I donât know what goes on with you personally, and i rather not wish to know, but you seem to treat the idea of casual debate as a bad thing by overreacting and saying âoh i treat it as a courtâ. Not only your treating the idea of debate as bad (which coinvently only happens if it doesnât go your way), and itâs pretty telling that youâve never went to an actual court before, because this case would be insta- thrown out like days agoâŚ
âŚBut are you implying that iâm out to get you? Is that why you keep on saying âOh iâm treating this as a courtâ?, because you think iâm out to destroy your reputation (which you did pretty much just fine on your own it seems) or something?
Youâre just another John Dicker Harry whozit i come across everyday on the street while i sip on my 5th cup of coffee today. Another monday morning.
Is that a problem that i think the game would be better off with consistent rewards to work towards, that benefits gamers who put in the effort, and not fuel and encourage those who have gambling addictions? 
This sort of âlol you being hypocriteâ doesnât really work, if you donât explain whatâs wrong with this argument iâm presenting here. Unless your actual argument is you care only about the corporation making money, which, i think that tells all we need to know that youâre not here to make the game better if thatâs your thought process here.
You seem oddly offended that i said that, with your static mindset of thinking âThis is a court case because you disagree with me!!â clouding your judgement, and proceeded to project upon me of your own issues here instead of looking at the reality of the situation like iâm doing here by calling it a casual debate.
You might want to take a break from the forums if youâre getting THIS upset at somebody for having a casual debate to a point where youâre comparing it to court cases. I mean even some of the people whom i agree with right now, did just that and their the better for it.
⌠I fail to see how thatâs a bad thing other then you not feeling (which is subjective btw) special for having an artificial scarce item.
Scrolled down for this, was not disappointed.
I love dwarves
2 Likes
âcomments on this META ARGUMENTâ you actually donât know how to read or what?
That doesnât somehow mean that these things arenât concepts that our human minds made up. But clearly I am describing concepts beyond you and wasting my time.
Yeah, I have things like a job and hobbies like actually playing WoW.
Rich coming from you. The problem is you clearly have zero critical thinking skills and this gives you the advantage of incorrectly perceiving others who actually have critical thinking skills as not having it.
Except I do realize that. The problem is you donât
Case and point this:
Except for when weâre talking about videogames⌠you know⌠the thing that youâre supposed to HAVE FUN WITH??
Youâre in high school arenât you? Itâs amazing that you have such trouble understanding a simple concept. Time is literally a thing humans made up. It doesnât actually exist.
Yeah, okay Iâm not reading the rest of your ridiculous, zoomer ramblings
How to know someone didnât get what they want. ROFL
I recently got the Infinite Timereaver and that moment when I realized was amazing. I will always remember how it happened and where I was in game. One of those special moments that happens along your WoW timeline since you started the game. A highlight if you will.
1 Like
Oh I will, I will.
I got the mount in less than 400 attempts, and I say the drop rate is too low.
So these annoying things in my bags are worf monies?!?
Honestly Iâd argue not to interact.
People whom would argue over niche peculiarities in-game are similar to people IRL, where one of their friends could say that itâs raining where they are only for them to say âNo it isnât.â despite already knowing said friend is talking about where they live.
Theyâre not wanting a dialogue. Theyâre wanting semantics.
Oh looky, another comment where you took 2 days to reply. Letâs see if itâs any better.
Meta-arguments are arguments about one or more arguments, or argumentation in general.
Either way, if youâre going to say youâre not going to respond to something or âNot waste my time any furtherâ, it would better to⌠not actually respond to something, to actually follow it up.
Iâve already explained why Time and Distance are objective. Even if they are made up as you said, their made up for the purpose for having a functional society to thrive at all with measurements like that. Things that are important like medicine, building plans and so on, and it what gives away more of the math as you see here that is intertwined in our society to take subjective feelings out of objectivity. No matter how you feel, a foot long is still a foot long. A Mile is still a mile. A Minute is still a minute. An Ounce of Water is still an ounce of water.
Normal people can understand that Time and Distance is objective.
So does everybody else mate.
And previously, you went from replying hour or less towards somebody to 2 days later.
Also, nice job using the âplaying the gameâ subjective rhetoric that is often ill defined, and to act as if somebody playing the game differently then how you subjectively define it, is a moral sin in your books, because to you, playing the game in a certain way is akin to politics, despite the fact youâre constantly blaming the opposition for the same exact thing youâre doing.
Gosh, i wonder whoâs the group of people that does that here? 
Sounds like your projecting your own issues on to me mate. I was really hoping those 2 days will help me your comments better, but i guess that was wishful thinking on my part.
Except you donât, because otherwise you wouldâve stopped making arguments because to your own logic, âitâs just a video gameâ because, why would you care if you actually think âItâs just a video gameâ? Youâre only using that as a silence tactic to draw attention away from your own hypocritical logic here. Itâs intellectually cowardly because it has the capacity to be used to dismiss anything.
Including your thread while back ago here for purposes of this example.
By your own logic, youâre shooting yourself in the foot here with your âitâs just a video gameâ Rhetoric. There is literally nothing wrong with debating about a topic that pertains to video games, as youâre heavily implying. The only problem that would have that problem is⌠ironically enough, Video game Journalists 
.
And thereâs nothing wrong with realizing that fun is a subjective concept, as you implied heavily. Fun isnât an objective measurement that canât be used because it canât be qualified given how subjective it is. The fact that thereâs some people that arenât playing this game or playing something like FF14 or GW2, shows that fun is subjective.
If youâre going to tell me iâm stupid, donât follow it up with something stupid like this.
Itâs amazing that time and distance being objective, is a concept that can be easily grasped by Kindergardeners, given the fact they have a set schedule and PE exists, as well basic shapes and math. Itâs a great thing to teach to kids.
And yet over here, youâre saying âit doesnât existâ. You might want to join those flat earthers given how insane and misleading your arguments are, given that you donât even explain properly how it doesnât exist.
Apparently if i think Time and Distance is objective, that means iâm a Zoomer. 
Aside from you getting my generation wrong when you couldâve easily looked in the thread on where iâve said my generationâŚ
⌠You still continue to double down this wrong idea, while insulting a generation of people, who, at this point are way smarter and can look at the facts, then try to pull whatever Alex Jones-etse conspiracy theory youâre pulling here where time is somebody not objective. They are smarter then you at this point.
This is literally you right now mate.
too long didnt read 
Well i guess you donât need to be correct then mister jones.