You have any examples of any campaigns or stories of this? I’d be curious to see for myself
1 Like
In my case, the new dubbing for Latam is good, it makes more sense with the original language and surely the lip sync, although I would have liked them to keep the old dubbing, I don’t complain about the new one and I think they tried hard on the new dubbing, it’s just a matter of getting used to it obviously It doesn’t beat the old one but it doesn’t disappoint you either.
1 Like
Not all WoW lore is bad. Parts of it enriched the rts lore and corrected some of its inconsistencies
We have new model for Anasterian now. How would he work in the campaign now without having new voicelines now?
Maiev could appear on the barrow prisons
Kael’thas could be present when Antonidas deployed Jaina
These are not WoW lore but if so happens in game, need new voicelines
6 Likes
So what? Just because it’s the same universe doesn’t mean both things are good.
Exactly vice versa, one is amazing, other is utter trash.
1 Like
It also doesn’t mean it “taints” the brand or anything.
1 Like
Toggle yourself to WoW forums.
It tainted the lore and good writing… Why should anyone want that crap?
Probably to spite people like you now since you’re being obstinate which is fine, it’s your opinion and all, but you’re just being inflammatory and kind of spammy on top of it.
EDIT: Alternatively, people have fun with it.
3 Likes
Only because you insist on literally making wc3 a prologue to WoW…
Well i have fun playing WoW too, but not thanks to amazing lore, but rather pvp or m+ experience.
I mean I didn’t know I had to ever explain to people how a series works but here we are.
I can’t believe Warcraft 3 made Warcraft 2 a prologue…
Also. I don’t insist on it. I don’t own the IP or the direction it heads. You might want to address the direction of the series with Blizzard.
Difference is, both of these things are awesome… a bit different ofc, but still very cool.
WoW lore is not cool, WoW lore is not good… and that is the whole point.
I just want people to stop insulting me for fighting for the game to remain what it is, rather than some WoW modified brainwash.
As simple as that.
You really don’t have to think i find you responsible for anything, you are one among many others i try to give honest opinion on why that would be ultimate downfall of the game we all know and love. (I know some want it to be toggled, but it doesn’t change the fact that it would be beginning of the end)
As it might result in slight rise with players with that… ultimatively it would destroy the spark that held people to stick around for 20+ years and discuss many things over those decades.
I don’t think the melee turned into 0 players, ofc not… that would be foolish to say, but it would certainly ruin all the memories and wash off the hope that one day… Any day of the future, we might have actual satisfying conclusion in wc4.
Regardless of how it would end, with its own ups and downs as any game has, regardless of which side would be victorius… All we want is decent end.
People can keep spamming WoW is that conclusion all they want… As long as i breath i ain’t accepting that end. You can either join me on a journey to witness this campaign to perhaps overthrow SC as perhaps best and most attractive ever, or you can feel free to say… you’re a lunatic and do whataever makes you happy.
People had a chance to stand up for WoW, and they failed to do so.
This may be a whole lot smaller community, but i am thankful to know there are many others like me, who think they deserve more after 20+ years.
None of us wants nor Arthas, Illidan, Tyrande and many others neither to win or lose… we just want proper end, that will leave everyone hold their breath and say… damn i did not expect this.
Implementing things to “fit WoW storyline” and not reacting to it, is putting a stamp on a cancellation of wc4 once and for all.
New campaign is fine, WoW campaign is not…
This is democratic society, and you can be for it, or you can be against it.
For now, we have won the battle, but we’ll see who wins the war…
(Sadly seems like 4th war is not Alliance vs. Horde, it seems it’s people who want proper wc4 and people who want WoW campaigns in reforged).
Not the war i was hoping for xD
That’s cool but what you think doesn’t change the official stance on what is or isn’t canon in the Warcraft series because it’s not decided by you or me.
TL;DR the rest.
3 Likes
What does this mean? I am not really sure 
https://www.google.com/
1 Like
Are you okay?
1 Like
Maybe they should make a DLC later for people who have WOW subsctription 
And retcon the story
But for us.
Reforged and and alternative storyline is better
3 Likes
I wouldn’t go that far.
What’s wrong with Ragnaros and Neferian in Blackrock Mountain?
Or the Old God C’thun in Silithus?
1 Like
They believe that it blocks possibility of Warcraft 4. Which is not true as Warcraft 4 can happen after or alongside WoW events. The only blockade is Blizzard not being eager to make a new RTS game that could be great hit against Starcraft.
1 Like
I’m pretty sure BFA is the Fourth War, so it may be the setting stage for WC4
2 Likes
Yes, but first we need “new” Warcraft 1 and 2 because a lot of things have changed respect from the old times. Like Medivh that in Warcraft 1 was a bald crazy wizard that summons scheleton. We need a better scenario with Khadgar, Lothar, Garona and a quick Cutescene where khadgar take the aging spell in the face
1 Like
Yes, we would also need to retcon WC1 and WC2 if we would reforge them, here’s some observations by deestrasz:
1 Like