ZVP: Bring back Scourge (Test on PTR)

Buddy, you dont even know that overlords provide supply. You have no room to try to talk down to anybody.

4 Likes

Lol GM are nothing to do witch gsl level but bruh

“I dont recall any terrans running around with a sniper ball of 10+ ghosts.”

I have seen a highlight of terran winning a game with ~15 ghosts sniping all mutas and Brood lords. Hence the snipe nerf ^^

Also just have seen some more recent matches, ghost balls are still used, even after snipe nerf.

1 Like

Was that when snipe was amazingly powerful and energy efficient, and people could bind it to the scroll wheel so all you had to do was point your cursor at the enemy and unlock the wheel? (im aware the actual mechanics of operating it like that were different, but in practice that was how it worked, i think)

4 Likes

They don’t need to “scale linearly”, most units in sc2 don’t. That doesn’t stop the fastest air unit in the game with 7 range, the ability to attack while moving, and a bonus to light from being able to counter a melee suicide light unit.

Also stop acting like phoenixes are dead weight, they have the highest utility out of each race’s basic aa unit, being able to instantly take out non-massive ground units out of a fight.

Except they wouldn’t, they would only counter capital ships like they’re supposed to? Do you think every game someone makes air it ends in 200/200 capital ship fleet vs fleet?

Right, I forgot you’re gold.

You can. It depends on the # of scourge. Corruptors can certainly protect themselves with minimal kiting.

This is a ridiculous argument, you can have 5 archons or 10 mines and zerg could never engage into capital ship fleet with pure scourge.

Also, you’re saying vr would counter scourge? No scourge would counter vr but it would be same relationship as mutalisk where protoss can deny zerg enough gas to beat scourge with pure vr and kiting. Again, you would know this if you played at semi-high level.

Speaking to me about opportunity cost while acting like sky-terran is not a once in a blue moon scenario for terran. Lmao gold leaguers never get old.

Except scourge wouldn’t because of phoenix, corruptor, viper, and liberator.

Yes, I forgot that the ability to split mutalisks made thors irrelevant vs them… Owait

You don’t recall because you haven’t watched professional tvz in years.

Yes you can because they’re incredibly fragile and gas intensive. They haven’t denied you the ability to go air just because they counter capital ships. Yet again you can still beat scourge with phoenix, liberator, corruptor, and viper from the air.

If you think zerg would be trading 25/75 units for 100/0 to supply block zerg players you need your posting privileges revokes. This is the equivalent of telling zergs to run banelings into pylons lategame in hopes of supply blocking the protoss. You are so far off from any semblance of understanding competitive 1v1 gameplay it’s just always a complete waste of time engaging with you. At least terranic could put up theoretical arguments, yours are another level of stupidity.

False, mutas are 50 gas per supply, scourge are 75. Again please don’t talk about balance from gold league.

Pros split mutas all the time engaging into armies, that doesn’t make pb or fungal not an effective counter to them.

Alternatively you can have 5 corruptors kill those individual scourge he’s sending in for free, but hey maybe building anything beyond broods is too much to expect from a gold player.

Buddy, you’re seriously suggesting for players to suicide gas units for supply depots. Get out.

Assess by gm or mmr, protoss is overrepresented regardless.

This is a strategy game mate. You dont have to trade efficiently to win, you have to kill the enemy. If he cant make units while your army is killing his base because he has to spend all his larva on overlords… youve won.

2 Likes

Just show me any game this is done with banes and I’ll eat my words :slight_smile:

What, killing overlords with banelings? Are you stupid?

But assuming you mean pylons or supply depots, its not remotely comparable, because banelings cant just fly into the enemy base whenever they feel like it and A-move to hit exclusively the supply units.

1 Like

Again, have you watched a single competitive tvz in the past year? Banes are frequently used in runbys to make room for lings or just to kill workers. In these runbys oftentimes a group of 5-6 banes takes out 3 supply depots, say at the third wall off. Rather than making more banes and running into the adjacent supply depots, zerg players instead choose to go for the production itself or workers because they would never willingly take that trade in the first place. And if it’s not worth it to trade 5-6 banes for 3 depots, why would you think zergs would trade 6 scourge for 3 overlord when scourge cost 12.5 gas more?

Because killing overlords is a lot more impactful to zerg than killing supply depots or supply pylons. It consumes larva to replace as well as minerals, and anything that can eat into the enemy larva count gets you a big advantage.

1 Like

Larva is a non-issue for zerg by the time you can have enough spare gas to be running scourge into overlords, not to mention zvz lategame already gravitates towards lurker viper spore, 2 of those would wreck scourge. Like spores would literally one-shot scourge, and you’re saying zerg players would be running scourge into overlords?

You really dont understand the idea of strategy at all do you.

1 Like

What I understand is viability of a strategy, guess that’s too much to expect from a gold player.

Give zerg a hero leviathan that spawns free scourges. That’ll get all the zerg players to come back. You’re welcome blizzard.

I am watching GSL level zergs dying to skytoss even after making 100 spores.

It will never happen because Apetoss currently doesn’t have corsairs which could burst down flocks of scourge. I think there is a simple fix: make units under microbial shroud both cloaked and undetectable, e.g. they can’t be seen nor targeted even if an observer is present. Units under a shroud when revelation is cast are not revealed.

PvZ late game is a A) vision and B) range. Current Protoss is 100% advantaged in both categories due to A) revelation and B) tempests. Changing MS to make zerg units immune to vision/detection gives Zerg the advantage in vision, Protoss keeps the range advantage (on top of their splash, supply efficiency, and numerous other advantages).

Oooh so ZvZ becomes lurker infestor? Actually I think every MU would become that.

No terran bio armies are way too mobile so they’d just move away from the MS location and the energy would be wasted. Even Terran’s bases can do that. The same is true for ZvZ. Zerg armies are hyper mobile and it’s cheaper to give up a hatch than to take a bad fight. Skytoss deathballs are more committed to a position.