Witness PPP doublethink in action

Are you retarded, it doesn’t. Zerg gets lead at 10 minutes. Also you are still forgetting, that this is after terran deals damage. Terran will kill drones with hellions, libs and what not, to slow zerg economy. If you don’t do damage to zerg in early-to midgame you gonna lose…

You are completely ignorant to everything that doesn’t fit your agenda…

And all that shows is that Zerg can’t get an eco lead while worker production is still happening for Terran. Only after Terran stops making workers does Zerg take the lead because Zerg keeps making more. How are you not understanding this?

You’re also forgetting that this data includes the times Terran tries to do damage and fails, because the winrate in this data set is roughly 50%. Terran eco is just as good as Zerg’s. It’s sad that Terran has so many advantages in the match up.

Anyway I’m done arguing with you. You’re too whiny to understand how the game works. Just another typical Terran whiner.

1 Like

How are you not understanding, that if terran didn’t kill any workers, or didn’t trade to slow down zerg economy, zerg economy would exceed terrans :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :joy: :joy: :joy:

It was literally like that since WoL. Find me one pro terran, which macros until 10 minute and then moves across the map…

The big question is can PPP actually think in order to double-think?

4 Likes

Blatantly false. Serral lost to Stats 2-3 in ASUS ROG. Serral lost to Stats 0-2 in Homestory Cup. Serral lost to Classic 0-3 in IEM. Serral lost to Zest 0-2 at IEM. Etc, etc.

His ZvP win-rate is roughly 70%, meaning he will lose about 22% of his best of 3’s vs Protoss.

1 Like

Lmao. That one guy at the start of the thread. Doesn’t bother to read it. Posts a blatant straw man of the first sentence he reads and clearly demonstrates double-think as he does so. PPP then upvotes him to +9.

If you point out that a Protoss is second in earnings for 2020, they immediately say ZeRg Is oVeRPoWeRed. Why? BEcauSe A ZeRG IS In fIrSt PLAce WHilE A PrOtosS is SEconD. But, that reasoning magically doesn’t apply when you then point out that Protoss being second means they out-earned all Terran players. Lmao.

They couldn’t help themselves. They swallowed it hook, line, and sinker. The thread is literally titled “Witness PPP double-think in action”. Their egregious double-think is so hyper predictable you can provoke it at the snap of a finger, which they will do despite the fact they are confirming the accusations of the title.

2 Likes

To adapt the infamous BerzerkSword’s comment to this situation:

2 Likes

The difference between Terran and Protoss earnings is pretty small and might even beat out Protoss earnings by the end of the year.

We got 5 Terran already a lock for IEM. 3 Zerg. We only got 1 Toss locked. That Toss isnt the #2 earner (Zest). He is actually quite a bit behind and not anywhere near a lock. He just has big earnings from getting 2nd in IEM.

TY, Maru, Innovation, Clem… all these guys are racking up major EPT points and tournament wins. Rogue, Serral, Reynor… all dominating as well. You can say it is just becuase they are better sure. But you cant pretend these guys aren’t beating the Toss out in almost every measure (EPT points, Aligulac standings, major tournament wins, and earning… except for Zest)

1 Like

Fact: The highest ranked Zerg in the world has a rating of 3217 vs Protoss. The highest ranking Protoss has a rating of 3055 vs Zerg.

Fact: Protoss would win 36.73% of PvZ tournament finals if the highest ranking Protoss had equal access to tournaments as the highest ranking Zerg.

Fact: The highest ranking Protoss don’t have equal access to tournaments; the region lock was literally implemented to keep these players from dominating tournaments.

http://aligulac.com/inference/match/?bo=5&ps=485%2C177

2 Likes

OK, so why dont we see Protoss winning any Korean tournaments?

I dont think it is apples to apples. If that were true, we wouldnt see Zest or Stats getting curb stomped in IEM and GSL finals.

Serral and Reynor have inflated MMR because of region lock. I do agree that Serral and Reynor would be nowhere near as successful if they had to face Trap/Stats/Zest vice Showtime. I mean we saw Zest beat the **** out of Serral with adept timings when it was still relatively “new”. But still… Serral looks great against Protoss when the best Toss he usually has to play against is Showtime.

1 Like

How many times did Zest make it to the finals of Code S to then make a completely retarded mistake that cost him the series?

2 Likes

This year? Zero times.

Zest hasnt done much of anything except place second in IEM. To be fair to him, he usually has a ****ty seed and gets picked last and ends up in the group of death.

Meanwhile no names neeb and astrea both bagged premier wins.

1 Like

Don’t you know NA wins don’t count? Unless Scarlett wins, then they’re suddenly the most important tournaments in the world lol.

2 Likes

Meanwhile Nice, Probe, Has, Skillous and Zest have bagged major event wins. Still, it’s buT PrOtOsS CAN’T WiN TOURnAMEnts.

3 Likes

No if Scarlett wins they mean even less. Scarlett is a perpetual cheeser who plays more BW than SC2 as of late.

Also.
ZEST DIDNT WIN ANY MAJOR EVENT. He got second in IEM. Stop making stuff up.

1 Like

Factually incorrect. Use your eyes.

https://liquipedia.net/starcraft2/Major_Tournaments

1 Like

Name a Protoss player that’s better than Serral or Reynor. See, you can’t. They’re the better players, get over it.

Rogue is the only Zerg in the top 9 in Korea. There’s 4 Terrans and 4 Toss doing better than literally every other Zerg. I know you’re trying to deny this but it’s there for everyone to see.

Protoss not winning tournaments in Korea is literally meaningless. They’re dominating everywhere except among the top 5 players in the world, which has no statistical significance at all.

3 Likes

Apples to apples and oranges to oranges. Neeb and Astera in NA are like Serral and Reynor in EU. Please, besides Scarlett, do anybody know who is the “NA Reynor”? Not asking for the third and fourth…
BatZ likes to have it both ways.