Sir Ðióġeŋex,
You stating you actually care about his opinion makes me feel worried
Please stay safe Mr Random.
Keep your mental health in good condition while making fun of him ^^
Btw. What is “true” thread post count? I see 124.
Sir Ðióġeŋex,
You stating you actually care about his opinion makes me feel worried
Please stay safe Mr Random.
Keep your mental health in good condition while making fun of him ^^
Btw. What is “true” thread post count? I see 124.
One account with absolutely no visible identity whose only personality is to agree with batz: Must be legit
A dozen accounts with very visible independence and personality: must all be one person.
Honor its an important thing, I don’t want to be associated with sad smurf posters.
Someone scraped the winrates of GML/Masters from EU. Protoss leads Zerg by about 6% in win-rates in GML.
Lmao. Look at all the smurfs upvoting each other in lockstep as they ignore the topic of the thread.
Nope. You were responding to someone specifically on the topic of small events such as weekly cups. You argued that Ty/Rogue don’t do them. You were wrong. The fact that you feel the need to move the goalpost is proof that this proof is overwhelming and utterly destroys your argument.
Small events matter a lot in the new format. The fact that Protoss are dominating them IS proof that Protoss is overpowered.
Was I talking about another OPEN ESL tournament? Is there another tournament called OPEN ESL that awards 10 EPT points and $100/$200 for a win? You didnt even know who the #1 pro for earnings is this year (it is Rogue by the way, glad you got educated on that).
Trolls gonna troll.
Correct. So lets reiterate the facts so that the trolls remember the topic of the thread.
And Aligulac says the game is balanced and the most imbalanced match is ZvP in Zerg’s favor. I guess we should ignore that because you say so.
* you say Aligulac says.
In reality, it shows some statistics that, in your oppinion, mean the game is balanced (such as win-rates). You then claim the game is balanced, despite larger datasets of the same kind of data showing the opposite.
If your theory can’t be coherent across all the facts, your theory isn’t correct.
What larger data set?
Aligulac is 48% PvZ off 1400+ games for this period
If you are talking about this site it shows that on the Korean server, Zerg GM win rate is 57.6 for Zerg to 56.2 for Protoss.
h ttps://burnysc2.github.io/MMR-Ranges/
of course, you dont link to sources because that would require you to prove your statements.
And GML of EU alone is 25k this season alone. We’re talking about hundreds of thousands of games per day across which Protoss is systemically better than the other two races and has been for 2+ years. We’re talking literally millions of data points.
But yeah, you’re 1400 cherry picked games are ToTaLlY WoRtH MorE WeIGhT.
They do, people play better when there is some money instead of lame ladder points, and most of the GM ladder games are low level games.
Because those players are better lmao. The top 100 of ladder and aligulac is filled with Protoss players but they’re not better than Serral or Reynor.
Protoss logic is apparently that skill is irrelevant in sc2 lol.
Got it.
Now if Protoss is so overpowered, why dont the most skilled players improve their win rate by switching to Protoss?
How is it that all the most skilled players just happened to NOT pick Protoss as their main race?
“Every Zerg player should play like the goat of sc2”
This forum is such a joke. People here really have no idea that skill is a bigger factor than balance. This place gives migraines to anyone with common sense.
You mean like Classic and Neeb? Or like when Scarlett switched to Protoss mid match to beat DRG when he was GSL champ? LOL
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UrJ9lGuvi9A&t=134s&ab_channel=OfficialMLGSC2
Exactly, play better, and be like serral instead of asking for buffs or nerfs, you get it.
“Protoss needs buffs but Zergs should play like Serral”
I think nobody asked for P buffs here my friend, just debating about how P is not OP.