I think this exemplifies excellently how people’s perception and ability influences a particular prestige.
While there are definitely comparatively worse prestige, some are much more so niche oriented. How a player can make it work is absolutely on that player.
I don’t think Karax’s P3 is bad at all, I think it’s great. And I think anyone who thinks they can just do nothing but upgrade SoA and strike all game (without doing anything extra, such as Cyber wall in this video) is kidding themselves.
And that’s again why I said it before that “collecting subjective views” is not very appropriate. Looking at it now, Swann’s P1 is far worse yet anyone who has remotely even tried Vorazun’s P2 will know it is not even comparable to her P2.
Yet, the collective data so far doesn’t portray even this simple comparison (of just two prestige). Based on its data so far: Swann P1 > Vorazun P2 > Stukov P3 = Nova P2 = HH P3. Just simple take a look at these, how is an endless stream of literal infested (the fantasy of all bunker-fans) just as bad as “high cost no reward HH’s platforms” or “Strikless griffin Nova”? And somehow, the just as bad “Abathur P3 Limited Less lol” isn’t getting any votes.
Anyway, I think the data speaks for itself. Meanwhile, I am glad that at least some discussion regarding specific prestige and their solutions have been going on in this topic (as a side topic).