I have found a cool source that shows win-ratios for players, not match-ups.
That’s curious, statistical Protoss player will win 1 more game than Terran across 200 games played. Tbh I was expecting a bit larger disproportion.
Also poor Zergs.
Let just appreciate for a moment, that leagues above Silver have always over 50% win-ratio, and people in Bronze 3 have 18% win-ratio. (EU)
A moment of silence for our brave Bronze warriors.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Thank you.
Any opinions on topic?
I think the disproportion comes from Higher League 3 vs Lower League 1 matches. I suspect they count only “account owner” for rank determining (what would give 2 results a game I guess)
It’s not exacly the same what Some People mean, because it is win ratio per player , not match ups.
It is true that Protoss players have better performance across the ladder (with an exception for Bronze 3 - Silver 2, Terran still easiest race to play, hardest to master) but with such stats, this source doesn’t show anything bad happening.
I wouldn’t really use argument of cross league (Diamond vs Platinum) as argument to anything important, though.
I don’t know now, but not long ago someone put the data from EU ladder and the race that had more mmr on average was Z followed by P and T last, once the mmr reached 4,5k every race had about the same average mmr.Looking at that graph only gives the idea that P is boosted in platinum, while Z has more mmr in diamond, which aligns with my idea that Z race is the best race to play in diamond.
The matchmaker balances it out, but Protoss is so broken it apparently goes beyond the tolerances of the matchmaker. Thanks for sharing this. More proof that P>T>Z.
