Come on, don’t be stupid. How many games do you see won by killing the last building? Yes that’s how you eliminate a player but this scenario happens extremely rarely and almost never comes into play at literally every level of play. Games are over 99% of the time won or lost before killing the last building is even considered as the winning play.
1 Like
This is your only counter, miss quote and miss interpret. Being ahead in supply only means your were ahead in supply. Being ahead in upgrades only means you are ahead in upgrades…
You argue that together those things imply winning. But as was said before you apparently don’t know the win conditions for the game.
1 Like
*Being ahead in every way means you win the game, unless it’s terran you are playing against then it doesn’t. You admit as much when you demand a replay and say being ahead “doesn’t prove anything”. You’re right. Being ahead in every way doesn’t prove anything, BECAUSE terran is overpowered.
2 Likes
I mean yes, people usually surrender before it actually is forced to come down to it, but ultimately the decision to surrender is based on an assessment of your ability to prevent them from killing your base.
1 Like
In every way yes, but you’re not arguing every way. Or are you saying you were ahead in every way in this game?
Post the terran POV, not a replay.
Which you do by trading efficiently. BDS strikes again!
1 Like
Not what I said…
But you can be ahead in every way (up to one moment) and make a single costly error and still lose the game no?
1 Like
If you did, it would be visible in the video but such an error is not visible in the video hence their request for the replay. The zerg’s play is near perfect.
That is. If you think being ahead in every way doesn’t mean the zerg will win, then you think terran is overpowered.
My request was the terran POV.
Because Terran wasn’t dumb and made more than one type of unit, imagine Terran does just hellbat+medivac and pushes you, sounds bad right?, you did basically that, just roaches and ravagers against an army that counters them.
Wanting the replay is to also know if Zerg could attack earlier or doing something different instead of doing a bad siege and not teching up.
If you want to show T is op, at least use actual good builds and unit compositions.Show us your baneling and ling micro, show us your creep spread and your macro, show us your lategame with lategame compositions,not a poorly executed proxy hatch and roach vs bio.
1 Like
Look kid, I mentioned, composition, micro, positioning and I will add one more engagements. These are as critical at least, to the ways you mentioned as being ahead. Keep misquoting.
Not necessarily. You have the stronger economy than he does. You can afford to trade inefficiently because you have a much better ability to recover from any damage you take. Trading inefficiently but rebuilding (ie winning a war of attrition) is perfectly legitimate, and normally what zerg is strongest at. You just suck at it, apparently.
2 Likes
Ravager, roach, ling queen = one unit
When your argument is based upon fact-denial, it’s time to get a new argument. Even if I were only spamming roaches, it’s standard practice to use roaches to hold 2 base terran allins. You don’t have a point here. This is simply embarrassing.
The fact that you think roaches are as bad as hellbat medivac is proof of how underpowered roaches are.
Then why you didn’t hold it?, if it’s standard to hold them, and you didn’t hold it, it means you are bad.
Completely wrong. Trading inefficiently can only happen if there is potential to end the game. If the game prolongs, then trading inefficiently is the absolute worst thing you can do. Zerg has absolutely zero capacity to end games vs Terran when OFFENSIVE (not DEFENSIVE) terran battles are 4x more cost efficient for the terran. Defensive battles are even more efficient for the terran. Zerg can’t end games and terran is more resource efficient and that is overpowered because it means the goal of the game is efficient trading which is what terran is designed from the ground up to do.
1 Like
That’s the obvious question. In fact it’s the very question that I am asking. You’re getting there! Baby steps!
The we already told you, you are bad.
- Can’t point out even a single mistake that the zerg made.
- Zerg outplays the terran in every way.
- Says the zerg is “bad”.
I can point them, starting with leaving one worker alive that later blocked you with a bunker, it was an easy kill, just right click, and that bunker rush was over, instead of it, you went back with your lings and waited the terran to finish the bunker and then you had to make lings and a ravager on your main.
LOL
I WANTED HIM TO BUNKER RUSH ME understand?!?!?!?!?!