Wanting to let you know im already at 4.3k mmr without doing much. It was the first game after a loooooong break. Already masters tho
Have you proof now that you are 4.4k /4.5k with toss and zerg?
Wanting to let you know im already at 4.3k mmr without doing much. It was the first game after a loooooong break. Already masters tho
Have you proof now that you are 4.4k /4.5k with toss and zerg?
Oh so you won 1 game and didn’t get past 4.5k as terran, that’s really all you had to say. Thanks for proving me right again
Hit me up, when you got proof of your 4.4k toss/zerg
You havent done any zerg/toss matches on your wheasy account. Whats up?
Oh that’s alot of words for saying you didn’t get past 4.5k as terran. Thanks for proving me right again.
But those arent alot of words.
I can smell your insecurity from miles away You and bourne are so deep in that rabbithole, not realizing how wrong you are.
Oh so let me get this straight, you said you would easily get past 4.5k as terran and also you got your Akrij build now.
HOwever whenever I ask, you beat around the bush, deflect, move the goal post but it seems I’m the insecure one here - what’s wrong with the picture here?
Except that i dont.
I gave you a replay of me being master and beating someone.
Last week i provided you some evidence that it took me only 2 months (after years of break from sc2) to get to 4k with terran. Now i took out a 4.3k terran.
You however claim that terran means you get -400 mmr (or playing another race means +400 mmr) but however, you havent provided proof that you were ever close to being ahead with zerg/protoss You said you were but you “lost” your account. Yeah sure. Maybe show something? According to your theory you would easily be 4400 mmr z/p. Prove it.
There he is , there’s the sentry I know best . Thanks for proving me right yet again.
Like I said, no need to beat around the bush just say - “I can’t get past 4.5k as terran cause toss is an easy race.”
Literally presenting you proof that i can beat 4.3k without practise.
Mate. Jokes aside. This is your last chance of retreating your point. I have accepted the challenge. If i manage to get 4.5k terran then you agree that terran is not harder? Just for the record…i dont want any goalposting or any lame excuses because i heard so many already from you and bourne.
See you in a few days buddy i will get 4.5k.
I’m rooting for you buddy . Also make sure you’re playing terran and not anchoring to ‘random’
Or just make a new account
Thanks
Turtle Mech Terran can get you up to low masters … so dunno wtf you talking about …
Cannon rush can get you to grand masters, what’s your point ?
Turtle mech is amoving basically … And i doubt cannon rush can get you to GM, but if it does, so does turtle mech
OP was talking about high Diamond either way tho …
The example was high diamond - not limited to high diamond. The skill scaling issue goes up to masters 2. After masters 2 , Terran has the advantage
Before masters 2, everyone else has the advantage
Eh, this is a huge misnomer - I know you’re joking (partially, at least), since it’s the build itself that’s completely busted and absolutely stupid - I’ve done it exactly twice, both times I’ve won (TvP, TvT), and both times I hated how it felt because there was no real counter-play. One of those players was a 4k player off-racing Terran.
It’s a real build, even to the point where I’ve seen it a couple times in pro-play. 2 factory reactor cyclone SCV pull off one base. It’s an all in that hits with about 6-8 cyclones and it’s absurdly difficult to hold. It IS holdable, but it’s way, way harder to hold than to execute.
Okay. That’s fine. But your position is actually that you already know what’s causing the clusters. “Bad players pick Terran.” What is the evidence for that? Magical fairy dust and #trustmebro
Well theres a bunch of bad players, and they picked terran. It aint exactly a great and unsolvable mystery.
How do we know they’re bad? They’re low ranked. And why are they low ranked? Because they’re bad. And how do we know they’re bad?
Really never heard of circular logic before?
Yes, we know something because the measuring tool told us so. Its not circular logic, its just cause and effect restated from the other direction.
How do we know what the temperature is? Because the thermometer said so. Why did it say that number? Because thats what the temperature is.