Banes require bane nest. lurkers require lurker den
broods require greater spire.
ravager den lets go
8 Likes
Huurrr Dee durr derp Zerg so op.
Yes 
Ravager being used over hydra says a lot about ravagers.
3 Likes
has there ever been a Ravager Den?
because otherwise you couldn’t bring him back.
1 Like
Never been, although I feel like we need to nerf the ravager stats to make it worse than hydras. They are better in every possible way, more HP have siege weapon, no armor tag, same range (a bit bigger size) and are a bit more expensive, but still they are too strong.
2 Likes
Cough, cough, queens den, cough
Heck, creep tumor den
2 Likes
Ravagers are expensive only ground shooter… let them where they are, l2p
Once again… if you think playin Zerg is ez win… go and play Zerg, defeat oponents with eaz and be happy about cheap points!
I…actually don’t mind this idea.
I think a lot of what makes Zergs seem OP right now is the sheer game-ending power of a roach/ravager counter attack.
That said, a lot of this is Protoss trying to force stagnant, outdated timing attacks and Terrans being too greedy.
Well first off, the ravager den never existed so you can’t bring something back that was never there. Second, The ravager was designed to counter things like forcefields so that’s why it doesn’t require an extra building. They are the unit that gives zerg a bit better odds if they don’t have time to tech up into lair tech things. That’s why they are expensive the compensate for the fact that they don’t require a building beyond warren.