He’s never going to stop. His modus operandi is to derail any enlightening discussion on Mercy on every thread. In this other thread, he derailed other forum users expounding on Mercy as a pacifist, Mercy being an off-healer, and he derailed them with his usual boring trivial non-answers. And he never quits.
Right now, the hot-topic among the Mercy community is the damage boost change – some are calling it a neutral change, others think it’s a nerf. And even that topic he actively derails with his non-answers.
Suggestion: just give him a cookie. Or better yet, just ignore him, since he doesn’t really address anything new in his posts anyway.
There are terms that are generally/widely considered inflammatory, such as racist words
I won’t state any of these here as that’d violate the forums rules, but I am sure anyone reading this is well aware of several such terms
Anti-mercy is not one of those terms, and there is nothing inflammatory about its definition.
If an individual decides that a given term is inflammatory to them, tho in truth it usnt an inflammatory term, I don’t see how that changes things for a user of that term except in business or real world relationships…
For me, it simply delineates the difference between two groups of people, and that difference is not an inflaming one, like race, religion, etc
That being the case, I suppose the right to define a simple innocuous term versus the right to decide an innocuous term is inflammatory should be tested.
I do not know whether you are in or part of the anti-Mercy faction yourself, but my inclusion of the term in this sentence should suffice whether you are or are not
Whatever makes you sleep at night, dude. Also, notice how you keep avoiding any issue about Mercy and the patch notes? The usual trivialities from you.
I have responded to statements made that were/are about me. I do not consider such statements to be trivial, and I think most folks would feel the same
So? The substantive posts are about Mercy, not about you and me. It becomes about you when you pull it down to that level, which you often do because of your trivialities and non answers.
Each recent post made by you in this thread that quotes me has included a statement about me.
The overall thread itself is not about me, but this piece of the thread is largely about me due entirely to each successive post by you including statements about me
I have nothing further to add in this regard at this time
Good, because faced with your own reflection (me stooping down to your level), there really is nothing to add for the both of us. If you took a position vis-a-vis the patch, it wouldn’t be a pointless convo.
I do know that mercy is not unarmed. Caduceus blaster can do a lot of damage, but imagine if she is in a 1v1 against tracer or reaper or genji. She doesn’t have their mobility or damage. She can 1v1 other supports and several other dps or tanks. But the dps kits is more combat oriented (of course) than her kit. I’m not saying that she’s a bad fighter (because she’s not, i solo kill a reaper once using mercy) but the dps flanker definitely had more advantage than mercy.