Mad cuz bad? You have a very negative attitude and it shows.
An account that has over 400 hours of play time on it before it was given to me. Being reported for throwing, being toxic, etc.
If you cant win gold games how you expect to win plat games. Reality check
LiterallyâŚ.
There are varying degrees of average. And being gold is literally middle of the road.
Careful rhain, u doubled down but even that single example is now confirmation biasâŚ. ?? Dunno why it canât just canât confirmâŚ
I mean if YOU slightly agree thereâs some oddness going on that quote canât possibly be used for the âriggedâ folks
LolâŚ. Confirming that matches seemed âoddâ on an account that I took possession of and yet no longer experience oddness isnât confirmation of anything.
However, as youâve so illustriously stated previously (and basically everyone knows), MMR isnât entirely skill based.
Whoâs to say your endorsement level isnât utilized in match making?
That could have been a change made to the MM for 2-2-2 that wouldnât show up (at all) in your precious little Acti-patents as 2-2-2 wasnât implemented until long after original conception.
Also, endorsements came out long before 2-2-2. So itâs a reasonable assumption that an account (or player) whoâs known for being toxic/reported/thrower, is going to be matched against other toxic abs reported throwers.
Which would also potentially explain why I experience so few throwers in my own games?
But then againâŚ.
Itâs all speculation since nobody REALLY knows anything about match making
Edit: And as mentioned by HolloH, the more specific you make the match making, it leads to problems because the variation is too small.
I know it took me ages to respond(took a long break from OW to clear my head)
But this is actually something Iâve never even considered.
Rigging by player likeability is laid out in several of their gruesome patents that ruin the lives of people deserving better.
The smoking gun one is:
Screenshots of OW and mention of endorsements and other features like grouping up bcuz grouping up is teamplay lul. Also look at how pukeworthy table4. is. if you type stuff like âi love youâ and use emoticons youâll actually get better teams and better dda. if that mercy 1trick has a hot voice she will just do better. even in-game sheâll have better hitbox (no pun) and more hps
You guys were warned about this kind of stuff years ago in several forum threads, over and over. But gamers will be gamers. Theyâre GM so the system must work fine. Aaron, geoff and dion stand by their work so they stand by this kind of patented rigging in ow2.
you guys want rigging donât you?
yeah donât you guys have rigging?
I would love to see video evidence of this, else its capping
thatâs all you can cherry-pick out of the entire post? lmao get better.
patents > you
youâre not defending the system with evidence, and youâre not helping the âitâs not riggedâ side of things lmao.
i think at this point, it should be on you to prove a patent for rigging overwatch matches, with direct mention of overwatch, is somehow magically NOT in overwatch.
another ez win for the math ppl today bois
You said it yourself, I am not defending the system.
I am genuinely interested in your claim that:
If you can prove it with video evidence, then I will believe you, else you are lying and making up stuff as usual
read the patents please. several dda mechanisms include hitbox scaling among other stuff like registration prioritization, aim-assist/resist, ult charge % etc.
To help your case, you need to argue the intent and distance the system from ever having those implements. itâs not a live video onus. ip law > you.
Do you deny these patents are in-use with overwatch? Am i making this tech up? Did i somehow hack the IPO and slip in a screenshot of overwatch to go with all the rigging? What evidence do you have to deny/prove theyâre not in use?
Please tell us because youâre 4100 and weâre all hardstuck.
As somebody who placed in masters for a few seasons before I stopped playing competitive, Iâm empirically better than you.
Thatâs basically the mindset.
weâre gonna need a bit more evidence for that than just âread the patents broâ
and ur gonna need a bit more evidence than âmy bro climbedâ
what evidence do you have to deny the patents, the dev statements, explaining intent and mechanism of rigging? they literally show and cite overwatch and are in active use. thatâs smoking gun plausibility. so what has the other side got? âguys my broâ. ok right ur bro climbed so everything is not rigged and these implements donât exist.
The devs could end this debate with one orange font post. i dare them to come here on record and state none of these rigging patents has ever been in use in OW. They wonât, because legally they canât. Theyâre guilty of rigging and youâre guilty of believing this game isnât a rigged sham.
youâre the one that made the affirmative statement that blizzard is rigging the game, the onus of providing evidence that they are actually being used is on you
i just showed u the evidence. a smoking gun and a ded body.
plausibility > you.
now try your defense by counter-factually refuting said evidence.
example: [fact]this patent canât possibly be in ow because of reasons xyz.
I see youâre not caught up on this topic of conversation. Please read the briefs.
Start with How Competitive Matchmaking and Ranking Works (Season 28+) and go through the references, some of which are on video.
literally all you have provided are your own words
you saying âthe devs said theyâre rigging the game dudeâ doesnât mean anything unless you show me them saying that
you still havenât provided any video evidence of this btw, iâm sure if it were real itâd be very easy for you to go into some GM mercy mainâs stream and show how sheâs healing more per second than normal
Because it never happened, its just more of Outsideâs made up BS to mislead people