You cannot accurately rate two players comparably between two different systems, when the characters are balanced for one. It basically means the SR for 2-2-2 that characters are balanced for is the one with more integrity as a proper comparison, OQ means some characters are over-tuned, some are under-tuned, so its not a fair analysis.
OF course, but it still means all characters in play are simply not properly balanced (not that 2-2-2 will ever be), but it means the more accurate assessment of skill is in the system that tuning is done for. It basically means people will by and large respect OQ as the “lesser” meaningful SR between the two since OWL uses 2-2-2.
Not in the least, we watched OQ for a long time, so no, no one is "scared’, honestly I feel like I am talking to like 15 year-olds here with these kinds of comments…
I would honestly rather have just OQ instead of two systems… I think its unnecessarily complicated.
Access meaning its “fair” because it allows players to just jump on anything? That’s not how players by and large play, it still means its less balanced and ergo and inferior measurement.
“Flex” is by all accounts, something a smaller group does, its not the majority.
You made me laugh with that last one… in a game where most players don’t flex. Do you guys really think that your “flexing” is going to now carry games? I mean, I understand hubris to a point, but its never really been that way. All this “flexing” does is lose ult charge, and throw both teams off on what people are doing, so its more a tactic to take advantage of chaos.
This was a desperation mode to appease the almighty Korean players who apparently have far more time on their hands to game all day than the rest of the planet and were leaving OW.
But if you balance for 2-2-2, and not OQ, then you will have asymmetry in SR value. I mean if you are good with OQ being the inferior measurement, no problem. I wouldn’t put as much stock in it over 2-2-2 if balancing is done for that. If the reverse was true, that they balanced for OQ, then I would feel the same way about 2-2-2, but they aren’t.
If the characters are not properly balanced, it is tilted to favor some and unfairly cut others, so no, it’s just not a good measurement. Trying to separate hero balance out of this question is absurd. If I can only get 2300 SR with say Reaper in 2-2-2 but easily keep getting 2700 in OQ for the same skill,. then the systems are not comparable.