Your attempt at satire has failed you, considering the context.
This. They seem to be extremely against the Mercy mains they have bashed in this forum, but yet, here they are once again, following us around and trying to cause problems…
I’m pretty sure that qualifies as Harassment, and in worst cases, warrants a ban.
~Sincerely Yours xoxo,
a Lover of True, Fair, and Fun Balance. xavvypls
Dude, you couldn’t be more wrong. We DESPISED how OP and skill-less and boring Mercy became after her rework. We hated Mercy being a must-pick. We want her to be fun and balanced.
I like Valk though. Why does your fun trump mine? That’s what the whole problem is. You come at us saying she is objectively unfun and don’t give a dang about anybody who likes playing her right now. It’s all about you.
here, since I edited my reply in and the thread is hot:
Remove rez, replace with a cleanse or burst heal. Limit rez to Valkyrie and give her an unique E outside of valk. Rework Valk to be a powerful single target ult, which is more involved than chain aoe heals-- which fits her niche as a single target main healer.
I’d personally combine the first or second with the third.
Because Valkyrie is a cheap ult. It removes all skill from Mercy. It takes all the things that make good Mercys good and bad Mercys bad (positioning, keeping yourself alive, prioritization of heals) and simply removes them. You get to watch as a spectator while the fight happens.
Also why does it matter if we remove Valk? If Mass Rez coming back is the best solution, removing Valk shouldn’t be a big deal at all. They removed Mass Rez, why can’t they remove another Ult? I don’t get it.
I’m not saying you’re not allowed to like Valk. The point is that if a lot of people don’t like it, why not try and find an alternate solution that a lot more people like?
The same reason why the forums exist. To attempt discussion. Mercy mains on the forums are the only ones that are doing this kind of spam about it and then pulling the victim complex like they’ve not done anything wrong ever.
Why do people keep making assumptions about my intentions? They’re always false.
What context? The user you replied to talking about how you’re unsure about why people bring it up responded to GreyFalcon. So yes, this is all within context. GreyFalcon has seen, if not completely read the post. Anyone on this forum has, without a doubt seen it unless they’ve muted it.
Not really. If I qualify for harassment, so do you and most of the other mercy spammers.
Because given all the struggle the devs have been through with Mercy, any changes beyond a tweak to the existing design are pretty much never going to happen.
Especially now that Mercy is in a very balanced state.
First of all, they typically display cult like behavior!
Secondly not all Mercy threads are called cultist, because (Drum Roll, big reveal) the participants don’t act like it. So what’s your excuse for the ones that people actually respect and have meaningful discussions with?
Creating 20 + posts a day! On the subject is going to tick people off and reinforce the cult like status.
My taste is that if she retains rez in Valk, it may be useful for her to have an e outside in order to expand her kit and ideally make her more enjoyable.
Also, I hate chain healing on Valk with a passion.
Sunk Cost Fallacy. So just because they put in a “lot of effort” balancing out the problem that THEY CREATED a YEAR AGO we shouldn’t go back? That’s pathetic.
And BTW, this is a GAME. Fun is JUST as important as balance. You’re supposed to have fun in a game.
That would be fine but so many of you guys aren’t doing that, you’re just going on and on about how Valk needs to be removed wholesale and how it’s useless. I’m not saying all of you want that, but you just proved to be someone that does. THAT’S what I hate.