Ana should have to choose;

[Zephrin-11143]

@Skund-2376

at mid and lower ranks it can’t be oppressive because you lack the follow up

@Zephrin-11143

uhhh no. capitalising off anti isn’t hard. capitalising in the most optimal way maybe, but simply capitalising on it isn’t.

if a team fight’s happening, chuck a name at like >=2 enemies that are close to each other. either they go into cover, or they stubbornly stay. in the former case it means less people engaged in the team fight against ana’s team and they just need to keep doing what they’re doing in the fight. in the latter, it means they die because they’ll get shot in the team fight with their supports practically non-existent to them.

in fact you get more opportunities to get >=2 enemies naded in lower ranks because of less coordination (i.e. less timed shield blocks against nade, less coordinated shield cover for anti, less awareness to hide or simply back off for anti, etc.).

@Skund-2376

because you have many way to play around it

supports legit have minimal ways around helping an anti’ed ally live. the only real thing a support can do to help an anti’d ally is to lucio beat.

and that’s the problem here: a main healer with an ability to hard counter her competition —> inherently higher on the support balance hierarchy.

to overcome such a hard countering ability with buffs to the other supports, they’ll need to be at least overturned.

@Skund-2376

I bet many people who believe that nade is so oppresive will argue that Mcree FB is too oppressive

mccree flash bang isn’t a problem at all due to its inherent short duration and how its range limitations allow for more global counterability.