here’s a thought: instead of celebrating yourself, and wondering why nobody else is, maybe you should try putting in some consideration in how people might try to interpret your wall. For as much as you laud yourself and your suggestions, it’s a ‘clownish environment’ that you don’t see the difference between your post and the gag you linked.
- your first several paragraphs do not get to the point. If someone is trying to figure out what you’re actually trying to convey, it is a mess you’re asking someone to drown in before they have an idea of what is going on.
- The tone is all over the place. “some guy named ‘lucifer’ told me to @ you”
That isn’t going to read ‘a forumite suggested I use reddit for a suggestion"
It’s going to read "an incarnation of the devil talks to me, and I decided to act on his advise’
"i’m told there are issues implementing my ideas, but I’m going to ignore those, pretend i’m awesome and ask people to ‘follow my madness’
- When you’re not praising yourself, you’re insulting, or insinuating inferiority, with anyone else bothering to read that that doesn’t subscribe to the ‘whatever it is’ that is written there.
So you have a arduously long intro, a pointless bit of unspoken context that obfuscates the writing, uncertain tone, and shifts, with meta-text that needs someone to be in ‘the know’ to figure out if you’re being honest/serious/joking/insulting/memeing/whatever on top of needing a hefty bit of time investment to try to decipher what you mean, if you actually mean it, and then need to figure out if it’s even remotely worth considering the idea.
For all the patting-on-the-back going on there, it seems like none of that really occurred to you through the proof-reading process, esp when some parts of it contradict itself. “I’m told that the staff have budget/personal issues…” What that can indicate is that of the people on the project, they have more going on than there are hours in the day, so they have to prioritize how they spend their team in consideration of pro/con for short and longer-term changes.
A quick gag with a picture: easy skim, easy response.
A long post with a mess of stuff to figure out? Not an easy skim, not an easy response.
What you’ve posted is effectually a ‘loaded question’ and is like asking someone ‘when did you stop beating your spouse’. That question isn’t one answered with agree/disagree, so it’s not going to get the ‘answer’ someone ‘wants’.
Based on the other topic you’ve made, it seems you taking the approach of thinking ‘nobody agrees with my ideas’ to be the same thing as ‘nobody wants change’.
It takes a hefty bit of not-reading to draw that conclusion, and given what sort of stubbles your post has, it seems like you didn’t really read it through either, so that kinda begs the question: why would anyone else?